Editing
Eurovision Wiki:Administrative action review/Archive 4
(section)
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== October 2025 Block of Fruitful Frugal by Pppery == {{atop | result = Action '''endorsed'''. [[User:Extraordinary Writ|Extraordinary Writ]] ([[User talk:Extraordinary Writ|talk]]) 06:05, 14 November 2025 (UTC) }} :Diffs/logs: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&logid=173620955 :User: {{User3|Pppery}} *{{user5| Fruitful Frugal }} I'm requesting review of my own block here. I blocked Fruitful Frugal for a week due to edit warring at [[Nick Fuentes]] and personal attacks ([https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nick_Fuentes&diff=1319423080&oldid=prev&unhide=1 this edit summary which I revdelled]) following a complaint on my talk page at [[User talk:Pppery#Inappropriate edit summary]]. Both of these problems aren't new; they were blocked for edit warring before in July 2024, and then [[User_talk:Fruitful_Frugal#c-Fruitful_Frugal-20250327183500-Doniago-20250327171500]] is telling. And now they've posted a new rant accusing me of being on the wrong side and demanding an apology since their opponent on the edit war has been CBANNED. Personally I think at best that is trying to justify a wrong with a second wrong, and we all know two wrongs don't make a right. So, do people think my block was justified, or do people think I did something wrong and need to apologize? [[User:Pppery|* Pppery *]] [[User talk:Pppery|<sub style="color:#800000">it has begun...</sub>]] 05:42, 5 November 2025 (UTC) :Can we (as non-admins) know what the edit summary said so we can better evaluate the block? [[User:ChildrenWillListen|<span style="color:green">Children</span> <span style="color:purple">Will</span> <span style="color:red">Listen</span>]] ([[User talk:ChildrenWillListen|π talk]], [[Special:Contributions/ChildrenWillListen|π« contribs]]) 05:51, 5 November 2025 (UTC) :: {{Tq|Undid revision 1319421660 by Shadowfax33 (talk) All of these categories apply to Fuentes 200% Shadowfax33, especially the neo-Nazi one, and this bizarre, one-man-crusade that you're recently engaging in to sanitize his article makes me strongly suspect that you are a neo-Nazi yourself and one of Fuentes' fanboys, having come to Wikipedia to help clean up his reputation}} [[User:Pppery|* Pppery *]] [[User talk:Pppery|<sub style="color:#800000">it has begun...</sub>]] 05:54, 5 November 2025 (UTC) :::Thanks! I suspect the revdel is no longer necessary since the community has more or less decided to [[WP:SPADE|call a spade a spade]], and blocked them because of [[WP:NONAZIS]], [[WP:HID]], etc. Keep in mind that they have openly called themselves a [[Groyper]] on their userpage, and our article defines Groypers as {{tq|followers, fans, or associates of the American far-right activist Nick Fuentes}}, so {{tq|one of Fuentes' fanboys}} isn't an aspersion either. [[User:ChildrenWillListen|<span style="color:green">Children</span> <span style="color:purple">Will</span> <span style="color:red">Listen</span>]] ([[User talk:ChildrenWillListen|π talk]], [[Special:Contributions/ChildrenWillListen|π« contribs]]) 06:03, 5 November 2025 (UTC) *'''Endorse''' - good block given the history of repeated offenses (eg [[Special:Diff/1229802762|Jun 2024]], [[Special:Diff/1282644351|Mar 2025]]). If this incivility happens again, the next block should be an indef. [[User:Levivich|Levivich]] ([[User talk:Levivich|talk]]) 23:45, 10 November 2025 (UTC) *'''Endorse''' "good block given the history of repeated offenses." -- per the ever eloquent Levivch above.--[[User:Deepfriedokra|-- Deepfriedokra]] ([[User talk:Deepfriedokra|talk]]) 02:00, 11 November 2025 (UTC) *:{{ping|Fruitful Frugal}} edit warring is wrong even when one is right. No edit warrior ever edit warred because they thought they were wrong. Please review what one should do instead of edit warring because your response indicates you haven't any idea of what to do instead and are likely to get indefinitely blocked the next time you get caught edit warring. Thank you. [[User:Deepfriedokra|-- Deepfriedokra]] ([[User talk:Deepfriedokra|talk]]) 02:10, 11 November 2025 (UTC) *'''Endorse''' The edit summary that led to the block is linked above although it only works for admins because the edit summary was incredibly inappropriate and has been revision deleted. The edit summary appeared in the revert of an edit which removed certain categories at [[Nick Fuentes]]. It occurred on 29 October 2025 while the block of the reverted editor occurred six days later. If reverting someone, the edit summary should give a reason based on a desire to improve the encyclopedia. It should not casually cast extreme aspersions. [[User:Johnuniq|Johnuniq]] ([[User talk:Johnuniq|talk]]) 06:50, 11 November 2025 (UTC) {{abot}} {{Clear}}
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Eurovision Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Eurovision Wiki:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Navigation menu
Personal tools
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Namespaces
Project page
Discussion
English
Views
Read
Edit source
View history
More
Search
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Page information