Editing Eurovision Wiki:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement (section)

== Quick enforcement requests ==

{{Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement/Quick requests header}}

=== Permission gaming. ===
{{Hat|Permission removed. [[User:Arcticocean|<span style="color:#5A4FCF">Arctic'''ocean'''&nbsp;■</span>]] 15:08, 10 March 2026 (UTC)}}
* {{pagelinks|User talk:Tzedekha}}
'''Requested action''': Permission gaming. See their talk. <span style="font-variant:small-caps; font-weight:800;"> [[User:Cinaroot|🐈Cinaroot]] </span> &nbsp;[[User talk:Cinaroot|💬]] 09:18, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
:Also, see [https://tools-static.wmflabs.org/gamingcheck/output/plot_Tzedekha.png this plot] and [https://gamingcheck.toolforge.org/actor_revs_table/Tzedekha the revisions] => select 'any ECR page (ECR Except PIA)' to see Gaza war related edits shortly after acquiring the EC grant. [[User:Sean.hoyland|Sean.hoyland]] ([[User talk:Sean.hoyland|talk]]) 10:00, 7 March 2026 (UTC)

: {{Done}} - permission removed. [[User:Arcticocean|<span style="color:#5A4FCF">Arctic'''ocean'''&nbsp;■</span>]] 10:17, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
{{Hab}}

=== Talk:List of Palestinians ===
{{hat
| result = This has already been handled. If there are further problems related to a quick request, it's obviously not a "quick request" anymore and should be handled in another manner. [[User:Asilvering|asilvering]] ([[User talk:Asilvering|talk]]) 18:57, 16 February 2026 (UTC)
}}
* {{pagelinks|User: Insteadcoffee}}
'''Requested action''': Could someone please inform this user of the restrictions covering ARBPIA pages? And keep an eye on that page? A canvassing call was made off wiki and there are attempts to mass delete and ignore reliable sources. Thank you. [[User:Tiamut|Tiamut]] ([[User talk:Tiamut|talk]]) 08:10, 14 February 2026 (UTC)
:Bumping this. There are now several editors new to English wikipedia at this page, most of them from Hebrew wikipedia. Don't understand why they are being allowed to overrun it in response to an off wiki canvassing call. Imagine [[Talk:List of Israelis]] was suddenly a source of interest to Arabic wiki editors all advancing a similar POV due to an off wiki call. Please some action would be appreciated. [[User:Tiamut|Tiamut]] ([[User talk:Tiamut|talk]]) 15:36, 14 February 2026 (UTC)
* {{pagelinks|User:Lisa}} has mass deleted content at [[List of Palestinians]] twice now in less than 24 hours. [[User:Tiamut|Tiamut]] ([[User talk:Tiamut|talk]]) 17:47, 14 February 2026 (UTC)
*:Content that contradicts the page as it was, and without even an attempt to see consensus. Nor was it in less than 24 hours. Why make a claim that's so easily disproven?  - [[User:Lisa|Lisa]]&nbsp;([[User talk:Lisa|talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Lisa|contribs]]) 18:10, 14 February 2026 (UTC)
*::I simply mixed up the times, thinking it was 22 hours, rather [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_Palestinians&diff=1338347453&oldid=1338156158 26 hours]. Please note this page has been unedited for months before your changes, which are mass deletions, including of well sourced material that was subject to previous talk page discussions. So your claims are false. [[User:Tiamut|Tiamut]] ([[User talk:Tiamut|talk]]) 18:19, 14 February 2026 (UTC)
*:::I am not certain that the hostility evident above and elsewhere is entirely productive. Different editors may have different opinions. What claims are false? And, even if they are, might it be put in a more tactful manner? [[User:MarkBernstein|MarkBernstein]] ([[User talk:MarkBernstein|talk]]) 22:09, 14 February 2026 (UTC)
*::::Excuse me, what hostility? I have been accused of several things I have not done, simply for protesting mass deletions that followed off wiki canvassing that no one has addressed  For example, [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ALisa&diff=1338359168&oldid=1338356785 see here]. I think I am being quit patient all things considered. [[User:Tiamut|Tiamut]] ([[User talk:Tiamut|talk]]) 22:21, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

:{{done}} I've given that editor a CT alert. This is something any editor can do at any time. I've also protected the article for 2 days to encourage discussion rather than reversion. [[User:Valereee|Valereee]] ([[User talk:Valereee|talk]]) 21:55, 14 February 2026 (UTC)
* With no consensus, [[User:Lisa|Lisa]] deleted a very large amount of content, most of which had been in the article for a long time (more than 10 years in some cases). Tiamut put it back. Then Lisa deleted it again, [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Lisa&diff=prev&oldid=1338356785 accusing] Tiamut of making "an enormous change to the page with zero consensus" (which is exactly what Lisa did, whereas Tiamut had not edited the page since 2012) and demanding that Tiamut is the one who should get consensus. This is text-book edit warring on Lisa's part. [[User:Zero0000|Zero]]<sup><small>[[User_talk:Zero0000|talk]]</small></sup> 01:57, 15 February 2026 (UTC)
*:Length of time does not mean it can't change. There were discussions on the talk page pointing out the absurdity of including certain people on the list. [[User:Sir Joseph|Sir Joseph]] <sup>[[User_talk:Sir Joseph|<span style="color: Green;">(talk)</span>]]</sup> 04:35, 15 February 2026 (UTC)
*:: Consensus can change but there are mechanisms for that. [[User:Zero0000|Zero]]<sup><small>[[User_talk:Zero0000|talk]]</small></sup> 05:35, 15 February 2026 (UTC)
*:::Discussion is in progress on the talk page, so let’s use it. [[User:Boutboul|Michael Boutboul]] ([[User talk:Boutboul|talk]]) 07:16, 15 February 2026 (UTC)
*::::Til discussions conclude, we shouldn't engage in edit wars, which is what Lisa did by reverting twice — '''[[User:The_Cheesedealer|<span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS;color:#fca311;display:inline-block;transform:rotate(-3deg);bottom:-.1em">🧀Cheesedealer</span>]] ''[[User_talk:The_Cheesedealer|<sup style="color:#e85d04; font-size:10px">!!!⚟</sup>]]''''' 07:22, 15 February 2026 (UTC)
*:::::This section of AE is for quick requests, not for arguing over whether Lisa was edit warring or not. Let's move on. [[User:SuperPianoMan9167|SuperPianoMan9167]] ([[User talk:SuperPianoMan9167|talk]]) 00:20, 16 February 2026 (UTC)
{{hab}}

=== Melat Kiros ===
{{hat
| result = This is not the place to request CSD. [[User:Asilvering|asilvering]] ([[User talk:Asilvering|talk]]) 18:55, 16 February 2026 (UTC)
}}
* {{pagelinks|Melat Kiros}}
'''Requested action''': Delete the page as a G5 violation, as the creator is not extended-confirmed. The G5 tag was declined because she is also running for Congress, even though, according to the creator, {{tq|"[she] is most notable for publishing an open letter criticizing big law firms for their silence on the genocide in Gaza."}} [[User:Kelob2678|Kelob2678]] ([[User talk:Kelob2678|talk]]) 13:26, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

:* I'm the admin who examined the article for speedy delete. I determined the article was not eligible for speedy delete b/c for multiple reasons, including that it didn't fall within the restrictions at [[Wikipedia:Contentious topics/Arab–Israeli conflict]]. This article is about an American lawyer who is also running for the US House of Representatives. While she has spoken out about issues related to Israel, that in itself does not automatically pull the subject under this particular contentious topic, especially when she's running for higher office in the USA. As I told [[User:Kelob2678|Kelob2678]], if there are concerns about the article bring it up for [[WP:AFD|AFD]], which Kelob2678 has now done at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Melat Kiros]].[[User:SouthernNights|SouthernNights]] ([[User talk:SouthernNights|talk]]) 13:49, 16 February 2026 (UTC)
:*:I should add that in this case, the article is not directly related to the [[Arab–Israeli conflict]] per the [[Wikipedia:Contentious_topics/Arab–Israeli_conflict|contentious topics listing]] because it is instead about an American lawyer and politician who merely protested against Israel in the USA. Saying that anyone who protests against or registers an opinion about the Arab–Israeli conflict should be covered by this contentious topics would pull in tens of thousands of additional articles. Nowhere in the [[Wikipedia:Contentious topics|contentious topics enforcement procedure]] does it say we should apply the topics listing this widely. [[User:SouthernNights|SouthernNights]] ([[User talk:SouthernNights|talk]]) 14:28, 16 February 2026 (UTC)
:*::Certain ''parts'' of the article are indeed related to PIA, so I went in and [[Special:Diff/1338683243|indicated this]]. ECR should be enforced by reverts of edits to these sections. [[User:SuperPianoMan9167|SuperPianoMan9167]] ([[User talk:SuperPianoMan9167|talk]]) 16:58, 16 February 2026 (UTC)
:*:::@[[User:SuperPianoMan9167|SuperPianoMan9167]]@[[User:SouthernNights|SouthernNights]] The user who wrote the article is not ECR confirmed. If the non-ECR content is removed, the article is just about the campaign.
:*:::@[[User:Edittttor|Edittttor]] has made other edits that could be considered ECR. 
:*:::Diff 1: [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nida_Allam&diff=1337847452&oldid=1335616291]
:*:::Diff 2: [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kat_Abughazaleh&diff=1338590288&oldid=1338148977]
:*:::Diff 3: [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2016_Ohio_restaurant_machete_attack&diff=1337395056&oldid=1320382516]
:*:::Also has created multiple other articles with sections that may be considered ECR
:*:::Example 1: [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Darializa_Avila_Chevalier&diff=1337310952&oldid=1337307097]
:*:::Example 2: [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Junaid_Ahmed&diff=1337427807&oldid=1337378252] [[User:EaglesFan37|EaglesFan37]] ([[User talk:EaglesFan37|talk]]) 17:27, 16 February 2026 (UTC)
:*::::Counting those edits as falling under [[Wikipedia:Contentious topics/Arab–Israeli conflict]] is an extremely broad interpretation I don't agree with. To get clarification on if the interpretation should be this broad, I've asked about this on the [[Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee#Protests and opinions as related to Wikipedia:Contentious topics/Arab–Israeli conflict?|Arbitration_Committee talk page]]. That said, I will, of course, follow whatever the consensus ends up being on all this. [[User:SouthernNights|SouthernNights]] ([[User talk:SouthernNights|talk]]) 17:46, 16 February 2026 (UTC)
:*:::::@[[User:SouthernNights|SouthernNights]] I'm not sure if they would fall under [[ Wikipedia:Contentious topics/Arab–Israeli conflict]] or not, but the diffs do show edits involving inserting/removing content relating to allegations of AIPAC donations to candidates the article isn't about, removing a claim that an attack was anti-Israel, and replacing anti-semitism with anti-Israel about how some people view Nida Allam's positions on I/P (the next line and the source in the next line is Allam apologizing for past actions related to statements on I/P that some could view as antisemitic. 
:*:::::@[[User:Edittttor|Edittttor]]'s justification in AFDs for the Chevalier and Kiros are specifically related to their activism regarding I/P.
:*:::::Diff 1: [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AArticles_for_deletion%2FDarializa_Avila_Chevalier&diff=1337663276&oldid=1337647868]
:*:::::Diff 2: [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AArticles_for_deletion%2FMelat_Kiros&diff=1338591661&oldid=1338555820]
:*:::::@[[User:Edittttor|Edittttor]] created both of those pages, and their justification for the article being an exception to [[WP:NPOL]] was the subject's activism in I/P. [[User:EaglesFan37|EaglesFan37]] ([[User talk:EaglesFan37|talk]]) 18:15, 16 February 2026 (UTC)
:This seems like an extremely broad application of the contentious topic tag. The subject of this article lives in the US and simply commented on the conflict 2.5 years ago. There's no evidence that she has personal or professional connections to the topic and she has no influence over the course of events. While her comment and the public response to it made her notable, she has received lots of high quality news coverage for other topics that are not related to the conflict since then. [[User:Edittttor|Edittttor]] ([[User talk:Edittttor|talk]]) 16:24, 16 February 2026 (UTC)
::Since certain parts of the article are related to the Arab-Israeli conflict, I [[Special:Diff/1338683243|indicated this with hidden notes]]. [[User:SuperPianoMan9167|SuperPianoMan9167]] ([[User talk:SuperPianoMan9167|talk]]) 16:56, 16 February 2026 (UTC)
{{hab}}
=== Violations of [[WP:ARBECR]]  ===
{{hat|PP done by ToBeFree; request to strike non-EC comments not done by Sennecaster.<br/><small>[[User:Arcticocean|<span style="color:#5A4FCF">Arctic'''ocean'''&nbsp;■</span>]] 09:51, 3 March 2026 (UTC)</small>}}
* {{pagelinks|Talk:2026 Iran conflict}}
'''Requested action''': Multiple non-extended-confirmed users are violating the restriction in place on discussing this topic ([[Arab–Israeli conflict]] related). Namely, [[User:RealFactChecker101]], who has 35 edits, was already warned three times of the contentious topic on their talk page, and [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:2026_Israeli%E2%80%93United_States_strikes_on_Iran&oldid=1341162736 continued] [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:2026_Israeli%E2%80%93United_States_strikes_on_Iran&oldid=1341285932 to] violate the restriction thereafter. [[User:Editorofwiki9998]] has 68 edits, and has also been actively participating in discussions in violation of the restriction; I've just warned them of the contentious topic prior to making this request. Requesting that comments made by non-extended-confirmed users be marked or striked. [[User:9ninety|9ninety]] ([[User talk:9ninety|talk]]) 11:26, 2 March 2026 (UTC) <small>Note: updated link following page move 13:54, 2 March 2026 (UTC)</small>

:[[User:Wirmaple73]] with 54 edits is also violating [[WP:ARBECR]] on this talk page, despite having previously been warned and [[User talk:Wirmaple73#January 2026|even blocked]] for the same thing a month ago. [[User:9ninety|9ninety]] ([[User talk:9ninety|talk]]) 15:53, 2 March 2026 (UTC)
:@[[User:9ninety|9ninety]] {{done}} - ToBeFree has ECP'd the page for a month, and it looks like all the ones have either been removed, struck, or blocked on the current RM. Considering the pace of requests and discussion, trying to strike every last non-extended-confirmed comment is going to be counterproductive.  [[User:Sennecaster|<span style="color:#07643D">Sennecaster</span>]] ([[User talk:Sennecaster|<span style="color:#0F0E1B">Chat</span>]]) 03:28, 3 March 2026 (UTC)
{{hab}}
=== Yet another Gaza Genocide move request===
{{hat|This closure request is out of scope for arbitration enforcement, but would be welcome at [[Wikipedia:Closure requests]]. —&nbsp;'''''[[User:Newslinger|<span style="color:#536267;">Newslinger</span>]]'''&nbsp;<small>[[User talk:Newslinger#top|<span style="color:#708090;">talk</span>]]</small>'' 17:55, 11 March 2026 (UTC)}}
* {{pagelinks|Gaza Genocide}}
'''Snow Close''': [[WP:PIA]] area RM. Vast majority of responses are snow close, there is nothing fundamentally changed. [[User:Bluethricecreamman]] <span style="font-size: 85%;">([[User talk:Bluethricecreamman|Talk]]·[[Special:Contributions/Bluethricecreamman|Contribs]])</span> 00:15, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
:{{nao}} I don't think this is within the scope of a quick enforcement request, {{re|Bluethricecreamman|p=.}} As far as I know, requested moves aren't closed as an AE action (unless they were started by a non-extended confirmed editor or something). Maybe you should make a [[wp:cr|closure request]]. [[User:Chess enjoyer|Chess enjoyer]] ([[User talk:Chess enjoyer|talk]]) 01:29, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
::its in the conflict area on the most contentious page in all of wikipedia, so i thought it would be appropriate here, as I suspect only an uninvolved admin can do a snow close this early. There have been editors sanctioned in [[WP:PIA5]] for attempting to do their own snow-close instead of notifying an admin, i think, on that article no-less. {{pb}}thought it best to post here, but I'll make a closure request if this was an inappropriate quick enforcement request. [[User:Bluethricecreamman]] <span style="font-size: 85%;">([[User talk:Bluethricecreamman|Talk]]·[[Special:Contributions/Bluethricecreamman|Contribs]])</span> 01:55, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
:::Bluethricecreamman is absolutely correct. [[User:إيان|إيان]] ([[User talk:إيان|talk]]) 02:05, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
: Hi {{u|Bluethricecreamman}}, arbitration enforcement is strictly limited to conduct-related matters, and this matter does not appear to involve misconduct, so I have to close your request as out of scope. I recommend submitting a standard [[WP:RFCL|closure request]], as Chess enjoyer advised. —&nbsp;'''''[[User:Newslinger|<span style="color:#536267;">Newslinger</span>]]'''&nbsp;<small>[[User talk:Newslinger#top|<span style="color:#708090;">talk</span>]]</small>'' 17:51, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
{{hab}}

=== Page protection for high risk article===
* {{pagelinks|2026 Kabul hospital airstrike}}
'''Page protection''': This is an article currently displayed on the main page about a hospital being airstriked leading to mass civilian casualties, and it's part of a conflict taking place in a region designated as a contentious topic area ([[WP:CT/SA]]). If this isn't high risk I'm not sure what is. ―[[User:Maltazarian|Maltazarian]] <sup>([[User talk:Maltazarian|talk]]<math>\lor</math>[[Special:Contributions/Maltazarian|investigate]])</sup> 09:51, 19 March 2026 (UTC)
* I've got it watchlisted but it actually seems to be fine at the moment.  We can always revisit this if there are serious issues. [[User_talk:Black Kite|Black Kite (talk)]] 09:53, 19 March 2026 (UTC)
*:Sounds good, as long as someone is monitoring it. ―[[User:Maltazarian|Maltazarian]] <sup>([[User talk:Maltazarian|talk]]<math>\lor</math>[[Special:Contributions/Maltazarian|investigate]])</sup> 10:11, 19 March 2026 (UTC)