Editing Eurovision Wiki:WikiProject AI Cleanup/Noticeboard (section)

== Potential LLM generations by [[User:Bechamel|Bechamel]] ==

{{user|Bechamel}} recently submitted the article '[[English afternoon tea]]' for FA review. I came across this article in a happenstance manner, but I noticed numerous problems immediately. I suspect that an LLM was used to create this article. The smattering of dashes, the strange definitive language like {{tq|Afternoon tea is served at nearly all important official, social, and sporting events – without five o’clock tea, none of these occasions would be truly British}}, and the presence of an odd, bulleted list concern me. A look at Bechamel's other contributions show a strange variation in writing style from article to article. I asked Bechamel about this, but [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:English_afternoon_tea&diff=prev&oldid=1322745586 he denied] using an LLM. I am hoping that the veteran editors here may be able provide assistance in confirming if my assessment is correct. <span style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:8pt;color:#000000">''Yours, &c.''</span> [[User:RGloucester|<span style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:12pt;color:#000000">RGloucester </span>]] — [[User talk:RGloucester|☎]] 23:42, 17 November 2025 (UTC)

:[[Special:Diff/1322828706|Discussing]] with editor at [[Talk:English afternoon tea#Problems with this article]], requesting other editors here to hold off on disclosing any assessments they've made before Bechamel has a chance to respond, thank you. [[Special:Contributions/fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four|fifteen&nbsp;thousand&nbsp;two&nbsp;hundred&nbsp;twenty&nbsp;four]]&nbsp;([[User talk:fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four|talk]]) 03:06, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
::<nowiki />**Markdown** added at [[English afternoon tea]] [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=English_afternoon_tea&diff=prev&oldid=1321763447][https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=English_afternoon_tea&diff=prev&oldid=1321765319] and [[Venetian window]] [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Venetian_window&diff=prev&oldid=1276231153], and removed [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=English_afternoon_tea&diff=prev&oldid=1321967436][https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=English_afternoon_tea&diff=prev&oldid=1322104749][https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Venetian_window&diff=prev&oldid=1276231298].
::In [[Talk:English afternoon tea#Problems with this article|discussion]] editor stated they use MS Word but not [[Microsoft Copilot|copilot]]. After being informed of the markdown issues they stated they couldn't rule out the possibility that Word might be using copilot mechanisms despite copilot otherwise not functioning on their Windows install.
::Without evidence of greater disruptive activity, I don't think there is much else to productively do at this time.{{hp|RGloucester}} [[Special:Contributions/fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four|fifteen&nbsp;thousand&nbsp;two&nbsp;hundred&nbsp;twenty&nbsp;four]]&nbsp;([[User talk:fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four|talk]]) 18:41, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
:::Thank your hard work. I have gone through the article, line by line. A combination of [[WP:OR]] of primary sources, grandiose assertions that were not supported by their citations, mistaken page numbers, strange phrasings, and close paraphrasing. This is the first time I've bothered to enter the 'AI cleanup' line of work, and I can't say it was very enjoyable. I appreciate the work everyone does here. <span style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:8pt;color:#000000">''Yours, &c.''</span> [[User:RGloucester|<span style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:12pt;color:#000000">RGloucester </span>]] — [[User talk:RGloucester|☎]] 08:23, 19 November 2025 (UTC)
:They've created more articles with AI signs and had one G15'd a couple days ago. I've left a 'final' warning [[User:Kowal2701|Kowal2701]] ([[User talk:Kowal2701|talk]]) 17:14, 7 February 2026 (UTC)
: [[Stylophore]] ought to be nominated for deletion or restarted from scratch. Even if it cannot be proven to violate [[WP:NEWLLM]], the entirety of the references (save for a single monograph) is inappropriate. [[User:Einsof|Einsof]] ([[User talk:Einsof|talk]]) 17:54, 7 February 2026 (UTC)
::This has not been written using LLM. Rather, it has been translated from [[:ru:Стилофор]] where it had previously been developed normally. See [[User talk:Bechamel#Stylophore]]. I expect a translation tool has been involved. See [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stylophore]]. [[User:Thincat|Thincat]] ([[User talk:Thincat|talk]]) 14:32, 8 February 2026 (UTC)