Editing
Talk:Censorship of TikTok
(section)
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Concerns with title wording and rationale for bans== The provided article on "Censorship of Tiktok" does well to describe the recent history of governments banning the app, however is misleading in its title and lead section. For example, the lead section claims that India only pursued a ban of the app due to conflicts with China, but the article elaborates on prior bans from the country citing indecency on the app. Along with this, another improvement to the lead section would be to mention the Armenian and Pakistani bans as described later in the article. One change to the overall article which would improve its clarity would be further descriptions on why certain countries have decided to ban Tiktok. If the article draftee had chosen to describe examples of the "pornography" and "inappropriate content" which forced bans of the app from India, Bangladesh, Indonesia, and Pakistan, then an understanding of why the censorship occurs can be fortified. Along with this, the use of the word "censorship" in the title is a bit extreme, as it is less of the app being blocked from users to prevent the spread of information but more for its questionable content for specific cultures and concerns of data security on the part of India and the US. As well, more. elaboration should be given to the history of the US ban on Tiktok- though the "Donald Trump- Tiktok Controversy" is cited as a separate article, more information could have been given to contextualize the lawsuit and describe the changes in ownership as a result of the compromise found between Bytedance and the US government. My last recommendation for improving the article would be to keep the capitalization consistent across the lead and "India" section. Overall, however, the article's greatest quality comes from its simplicity in describing different cases of bans based on geography. [[User:Vanguard826|Vanguard826]] ([[User talk:Vanguard826|talk]]) 23:33, 9 October 2021 (UTC) :I agree with your concern regarding the title. “Censorship” does suggest information suppression, but in many cases the bans are justified by governments as either cultural norms or data security concerns. Instead of changing the title, maybe the lead could just explain that the bans differ in rationale. That way it stays consistent with similar pages like Censorship of YouTube but is clearer for readers. [[Special:Contributions/206.211.151.37|206.211.151.37]] ([[User talk:206.211.151.37|talk]]) 04:55, 10 September 2025 (UTC)
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Eurovision Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Eurovision Wiki:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Navigation menu
Personal tools
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Namespaces
Page
Discussion
English
Views
Read
Edit source
Add topic
View history
More
Search
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Page information