Editing Eurovision Wiki:Teahouse (section)

== Should I self-revert for edit warring? ==

At [[Jon Gordon]], I've reverted for a 4th time a copy-paste of the bibliography that I would consider spam/G11 and not fall under edit-warring, but now I'm not so sure. Could someone review this and tell me what to do/revert me if I'm in the wrong? Thanks [[User:Realtent|Realtent]] ([[User talk:Realtent|talk]]) 00:21, 19 March 2026 (UTC)
::Since you've warned them multiple times on both the article talk page and their own talk page, I'd report the account that keeps adding the content to [[WP:AIV]]. [[User:JohnLaurens333|🏳️‍🌈JohnLaurens333]] ([[User talk:JohnLaurens333|need something? Ping me!]]) 00:49, 19 March 2026 (UTC)
:Somewhat related question, but what counts as "won significant critical attention" according to WP:AUTHOR? Gordon has a handful of books that have made best-seller lists but is that significant enough? If not I will try to find more sources, but failing that I may try an AFD, and I'd like more advice before I try that. [[User:Realtent|Realtent]] ([[User talk:Realtent|talk]]) 02:07, 19 March 2026 (UTC)
::Hello, @[[User:JohnLaurens333|JohnLaurens333]]. Appearing in a list - even a best-seller list - does not, of itself, meet that criterion. Having said that, a book which has appeared in such a list is probably more likely to have received some in-depth reviews (which would contribute to the book being notable, but not necessarily the author). 
::(Note that meeting the special criteria for notability, such as [[WP:NAUTHOR]] do not say that the subject is necessarily notable, rather that it is likely that the basic criteria are satisfied for them - you still need to find those sources which meet [[WP:42]]) [[User:ColinFine|ColinFine]] ([[User talk:ColinFine|talk]]) 09:55, 19 March 2026 (UTC)