Editing Eurovision Wiki:Reliable sources/Noticeboard (section)

== Neutrality in Telugu newspapers ==

Telugu newspapers such as [[Eenadu]] and [[Andhra Jyothi]] have reported on replacement houses for [[Cyclone Hudhud]]. I can find an English-language source about these replacement houses first being built in 2016 [https://www.thehindu.com/news/cities/Visakhapatnam/cycloneresistant-houses-getting-ready-for-hudhud-victims/article8251454.ece] from an RS (The Hindu). From there most coverage is in Telugu and from these newspapers. Examples of articles like this are [https://www.eenadu.net/videos/playvideo/houses-of-hud-hud-cyclone-victims/1/35750] and [https://www.andhrajyothy.com/2026/andhra-pradesh/visakhapatnam/hudhud-houses-for-the-unworthy-1503223.html]. The thing is, they seem to be biased towards one party (the [[Telugu Desam Party]]) and against another (the [[YSR Congress Party]]).

Their articles also mention this, [[Eenadu#Political impact and TDP support]] and [[Andhra Jyothi#Criticism]] respectively. So, is the general information, that the replacement houses have remained unused, to be trusted? How much of it from these newspapers can I include in the article? [[User:HurricaneZeta|<span style="background-color:#ffd98c; color:black">'''Hurricane'''</span>]][[User talk:HurricaneZeta|<span style="background-color:#ffd98c; color:black">'''Zeta'''</span>]]<sup>[[Special:Contributions/HurricaneZeta|C]]</sup> 23:22, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

:It's important to remember that sources don't have to be neutral, see [[WP:RSBIAS]]. It's editor who have to write articles without including their own biases. The solution is generally to either include the details while excluding an matters of opinion, to try and find additional so as to balance any bias, or if unavoidable to leave the details out.<br />The critical sections of their Wikipedia articles only discusses bias rather not any criticism related to incorrect reporting. Unless there are secondary sources critical of the reliability of their reporting, especially if they haven't posted correction to misreporting, they should probably be treated like any standard [[WP:NEWSORG]] (making sure to note [[WP:RSEDITORIAL]]).<br />It's difficult to give more specific advice on the articles, I can't see anything immediately wrong but I do not speak Telugu and Google translate's results aren't great. -- <small>LCU</small> '''[[User:ActivelyDisinterested|A<small>ctively</small>D<small>isinterested</small>]]''' <small>''«[[User talk:ActivelyDisinterested|@]]» °[[Special:Contributions/ActivelyDisinterested|∆t]]°''</small> 21:18, 16 March 2026 (UTC)