Editing Eurovision Wiki:Administrators' noticeboard (section)

== User: Win Kyaw and disruptive editing, edit warring, personal attacks. ==
*{{userlinks|Win Kyaw}}
[[User: Win Kyaw]] is currently engaged in [[WP:EW|edit warring]], [[WP:NPA|personal atttacks]], and [[WP:AGF|assuming bad faith.]] I pride myself on trying(key word, trying) to stamp out vandalism, and NPOV editing (as with now blocked user {{userlinks|Icewhiz}}.) 3 days ago I noticed an IP ({{noping|72.45.163.130}}) making disruptive and NPOV edits to many articles about Rohingya people and Arakan/Rakhine. I then noticed that {{User|Win Kyaw}} editing nearly every article the IP did (24 out of 27) and editing similarly. I started an SPI because I noticed what I thought was a pattern of POV editing. I misunderstood [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Tuwintuwin]], an SPI, and figured they were socks of Tuwintowin, which I assumed was a master sock that was blocked. It is clear now that the account Tutwintuwin was appealed and has since been renamed twice, first to Imwin567, now Win Kyaw -- though those confirmed socks of the user are still banned, and they showed a lot of problematic edits, edit warring, and disruptive editing. I apologized to the user and stated I wished to withdraw the case and '''ceased editing'' articles they are involved with, but their actions since have renewed my concerns about their history of disruptive editing, blanking, and unexplained edits to articles pertaining to Rakhine/Arakan, the Rohingya and Rohingya genocide. (I had also realised the IP and Win Kyaw were not the same.) Some of these edits seem to ''imply'' whether intentional or not, the Myanmar government's commonly seen as racist talking point that "Rohingya are non-native Bengalis from [[South Asia]] that need to be removed" that [[Rohingya_people#Denial_of_the_"Rohingya"_term|they use to justify the genocide]], which has been debunked. ([https://time.com/4322396/burma-myanmar-rohingya-us-embassy-suu-kyi/ see this Time Magazine article,] for instance.) Some further instances of behavior are:

*'''Edit warring 1:''' After I apologized, [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Battle_of_Sittwe&diff=prev&oldid=1343086373 the user edit warred with me and undid my removal of unsourced content at Battle of Sittwe and re-added it.]
*'''Personal attacks:''' They attacked me personally by asking "are you blind?" in the edit summary.
*'''Edit warring 2, disruptive editing:''' Out of many other examples seen in their contributions history accross all of their sock accounts as well as this main accoung -- just now they engaged in [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Racism_in_Asia&diff=1343086209&oldid=1343034504 edit warring with me and removed nearly the entire section on the Rohingya genocide] in the [[Racism in Asia]] article, claiming that including the reason for Rohingya leaving is "undue weight," despite that content being sourced with 8 sources and being there largely since 2017. The content was changed from 

:"Since 2015, over 900,000 Rohingya refugees have fled to southeastern Bangladesh alone, and more have fled to other surrounding countries, and major Muslim nations. More than 100,000 Rohingyas in Myanmar are confined in camps for internally displaced persons. Shortly before a Rohingya rebel attack that killed 12 security forces, August 25, 2017, the Myanmar military had launched "clearance operations" against the Rohingya Muslims in Rakhine state that left over 3,000 dead, many more injured, tortured or raped, villages burned. Over 603,000 Rohingya from Myanmar, fled to Bangladesh alone, and more have fled to other countries. According to the Refugee Relief and Repatriation Commission, about 624,000 Rohingyas entered Bangladesh until November 7."

:to 

:"By 2025, over 1 million Rohingya from Myanmar fled to Bangladesh alone, and more have fled to other countries. According to the Refugee Relief and Repatriation Commission, about 624,000 Rohingyas entered Bangladesh until November 7, 2017."

:This section [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Racism_in_Asia&diff=prev&oldid=949033446#Myanmar once had 14 sources], now it only has 4.

*'''Disruptive editing 2 :''' Another example is they unilaterally moved the [[Bengali Hindus in Myanmar]] article to [[Bengalis in Myanmar]] and changed the entire structure of the article to add a section called "[[Bengali Muslims]]," in which they added content about the Rohingya, seeming to imply they are sharing the Myanmar government's genocidal claims that Rohingya are actually Bengali Muslims and non-indigenous.

:Of the seven sources they added:
:1 ("Aye Chan 2005") appears to link to Wikipedia itself and is cited 3 times. 
:1 is a source that does not work and also parrots the government's talking points on Rohingyas by calling Rohingyas "Bengali." When i found the archived version [https://web.archive.org/web/20160323001137/ttps://www.netipr.org/policy/node/39], I noticed it used very inflammatory claims like "Rohingya campaigners," and claiming at the end that "Rohingya/Bengali community we've seen today had already shaping up as of 1942." 
:1 is used 2 times and has no information ([https://www.chittagong.gov.bd/en/site/page/qPgv-%E0%A6%9C%E0%A7%87%E0%A6%B2%E0%A6%BE%E0%A6%B0-%E0%A6%87%E0%A6%A4%E0%A6%BF%E0%A6%B9%E0%A6%BE%E0%A6%B8 ])

*'''Assuming bad faith 1 / personal attack / edit warring 3 :''' In [[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Min_Saw_Mon&diff=prev&oldid=1343256630 this edit]] at Min Saw Mon, they assume bad faith and accuse me of editing "based on solely user's identity as per evidence from user's spi." and revert my edit, seemingly implying that I am racist.
*'''Assuming bad faith 2 / personal attack / edit warring 4:''' Here they reverted my undoing of an unsourced edit from an IP with an even more problematic editing history, and claimed it was due to "[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Minpunsa&diff=prev&oldid=1343258799 speculation & assumptions of user's identity]"
*'''Assuming bad faith 3 / personal attack :''' On their talk page they removed most of the correspondence I have had with them, including many warnings, and state that I did it [[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Win_Kyaw&diff=prev&oldid=1343258584 "based on speculations and assumptions on my identity and a failed attempt of making an user blocked based for 5 legitimate hours."]], whilst also citing WP:NPA.

There are other examples of disruptive editing, and the above, all in their edit history. They had also accused me of being a paid editor at the SPI, and I feel like they implied numerous times that I was stalking them. I am concerned, and I could be wrong, but I do not want to risk being a one person army and am trying to back off so as to not appear I am harassing the editor. They have numerous warnings that they have removed from their talk page detailing problematic editing patterns throughout the past couple years, including on their confirmed sock accounts, and it shows in their contributions history. I am bringing this here and not responding to any messages from [[User:Win Kyaw]] as to de-escalate and hoping for assistance. I also will not respond to anything unless folks are asking for a direct response. Thanks much.- [[User:R9tgokunks|<span style='color:black;text-shadow: 0.0em 0.0em 0.9em black'>''R9tgokunks''</span>]] [[User talk:R9tgokunks|<span style='color:black;text-shadow: 0.1em 0.1em 0.2em red'>⭕</span>]] 04:38, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

:this user is [[WP:HOUNDING]].
:there is no edit warring. Edit warring refers to [[WP:3RR]]. This user wants me to take permission from him for all edits I make. I have never been in any edit warring rather than this guy because mainly he is [[WP:HOUNDING]]. You are accused of [[WP:PERSONALATTACK]] (point 1, 2 and 3) in the [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Tuwintuwin]] (admins please do read his texts here). This guy would also placed random edit warnings in my talk page just to make me get blocked (it's his aim).. 
:There is nothing wrong with my edits for over an year, I have received no warnings or reverts for a very long time. Additionally telling ur blind is not personal attack, it might fall into sarcasm area. This user also adds I'm vandalizing while theres zero history about it. One admin has already warned this guy on his talk page because his behaviour is clearly disruptive. Thank u! [[User:Win Kyaw|<span style="background-color: blue; color: white">WinKyaw</span>]] ([[User talk:Win Kyaw|talk]]) 05:25, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
::'''Adding''': his reason to revert my edits are based on my ethnicity. His logic is similar to Jewish people's edits on Palestinians topics must be taken as fishy and NPOV because their government is. Similarly he keeps reverting my edits just because of my ethnicity and identity (see his accusations on [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Tuwintuwin]]). His only excuse of my edits being NPOV is that I'm burmese [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Win_Kyaw&diff=prev&oldid=1343035412 notice what he said here] = ''I have noticed that you are clearly Burmese and that a lot of your edits'' ~ my edits are removing [[WP:UNDUE]] weight, but he terms it as NPOV out of no reason based on my nationality. I mean, literally, if you find it problematic, revert it with a source and reason, but he would not, he would find ways to fill SPI, give "final warnings" on talk page and further threats very openly. He spent 5-6 hours on finding blatant speculations only to make my account blocked (failed attempted). 
::Notice how he also said "''I pride myself on trying(key word, trying) to stamp out vandalism, and NPOV editing (as with now blocked user [[User:Icewhiz|Icewhiz]]''" at the first line in this case, this concludes to he would try to do anything to make his targeted account blocked out of no reason and by spreading false allegations. He has done [[WP:WIAPA|WP:PERSONALATTACK (passing all of the first 3 points)]] based on ethnicity, identity and even age in the SPI ([https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Tuwintuwin&diff=prev&oldid=1343072857 look at this revision] (He said ''I was checking page reversions on their profile and found out they [are 17 years old''). This guy went around my whole Wikipedia history, then would note my age, research about my ethnicity, name and say more further stuff as if me being 17 or belonging to particular nation makes me ineligible to edit Wikipedia). He just wouldn’t stop until I get blocked as hes clearly on a mission with [[WP:HOUNDING]]. [[User:Win Kyaw|<span style="background-color: blue; color: white">WinKyaw</span>]] ([[User talk:Win Kyaw|talk]]) 05:53, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
::If you think edit warring requires breaking the bright line 3 revert rule, you're seriously mistaken and for an account with as much history as yours it's very concerning you still haven't learnt such basics of editing here particularly when you edit areas prone to disputes. Whatever else, you need to seriously pay more attention to our policies and guidelines and what editors are telling you if you want to continue to edit. [[User:Nil Einne|Nil Einne]] ([[User talk:Nil Einne|talk]]) 07:10, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
:R9tgokunks can you explain why you thought it was relevant that the Win Kyaw may be Burmese in the comment you made here [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Win_Kyaw&diff=prev&oldid=1343035412]? If WinKyaw is inappropriate removing sourced content as you stated, then that's a problem but Win Kyaw's ethnicity or nationality is irrelevant to that. 12:29, 14 March 2026 (UTC) [[User:Nil Einne|Nil Einne]] ([[User talk:Nil Einne|talk]]) 12:29, 14 March 2026 (UTC)