Editing Eurovision Wiki:Administrative action review (section)

== Editor acting in bad faith  ==
{{atop
| result = Wrong venue.  Dreamyshade is not an administrator and no administrative type tools were used. [[User:Whpq|Whpq]] ([[User talk:Whpq|talk]]) 16:26, 20 February 2026 (UTC)
}}

A wikipedia editor deletes all the citations in a page, and then nominates the same page for deletion and tries to fox others thinking that the page never had citations. please see this page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Global_Banking_%26_Finance_Review

'''Why would an Editor delete all the citations and then nominate the page for deletion?''' 

Then the same editor goes on to accuse that the page has only sponsored posts and without any proof. When asked what is the proof that these are sponsored posts? the editor points to the site's submit arcticle page tag saying the site accepts articles. If all sites which have submit posts tab or write for us tab are considered sponsored, it is not factually correct.

I would formally like to raise a complaint against the Wikipedia Editor @dreamyshade whoherself accepts that she deleted the citations before nominating the page for deletion because she beleives the links were press releases and sponored. If this truly was the case, she should have only nominated the page for deleteion and not try to manipulate others to think there were no citations.

Links to the page in discussion and pages
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Global_Banking_%26_Finance_Awards
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_Banking_%26_Finance_Review
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_Banking_%26_Finance_Awards  <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/~2026-11148-60|~2026-11148-60]] ([[User talk:~2026-11148-60#top|talk]]) 10:08, 20 February 2026 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

:Dreamyshade is not an administrator, and even if they were those aren't admin actions, so this isn't the correct forum, but the process you describe isn't unusual: An editor goes through an article and deletes unreliable/affiliated/bare mention sources to find out if there's enough left to support a claim to notability, discovers there isn't, and opens an AfD. If all the citations were to press releases or sponsored content, Wikipedia considers that the same as having no citations. [[User:Valereee|Valereee]] ([[User talk:Valereee|talk]]) 16:07, 20 February 2026 (UTC)
{{abot}}