Editing Eurovision Wiki:Administrators' noticeboard (section)

== Disruptive behavior by User:Wahreit ==

Per this [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Three_Alls_policy#Article_content_inconsistent_with_source discussion] on the [[Three Alls policy]] article, I determined @[[User:Wahreit|User:Wahreit]] appears to have added content to the article not supported by the source they cited. I am extremely concerned Wahreit is attempting to build a false historical consensus by writing whatever they wish and citing non-English sources that readers and contributors are unlikely to verify (i.e fictious reference). I have tried to avoid Wahreit and articles they contribute to as I have had many issues with them in the past, but as their false information was pertinent to the discussion on a related article,[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Yasuji_Okamura#c-Adachi1939-20260224010400-Adachi1939-20260223234300 [1]] I ultimately went ahead and corrected it. 
After I made my correction, Wahreit immediately followed up with WP:Hounding, wasting no  time in following me to the related article and acting belligerent.[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Yasuji_Okamura#c-Wahreit-20260224183700-Adachi1939-20260224010400 [2]] In spite of working with others in the talkpage to reach a consensus and that my contributions to the article used reputable secondary sources, Wahreit began nitpicking over WP:Coatrack issues[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Yasuji_Okamura#c-Wahreit-20260226214100-Adachi1939-20260225202100 [3]] and rather than work to correct the alleged issues, nor await the input of other contributors, has engaged in WP:Edit_Warring by completely reverting my contributions three times in a row now.[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Yasuji_Okamura&diff=prev&oldid=1340252107 [Diff1]][https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Yasuji_Okamura&diff=prev&oldid=1340421064 [Diff2][https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Yasuji_Okamura&diff=prev&oldid=1340644803 [Diff3]]

Around this time, the user also went and altered the [[Defense of Sihang Warehouse]] article, which in the past I had heavily contributed to and had past issues with this same user on. Nearly two years ago, it was determined through extensive discussion and a laundry list of sources on the talk page that the Imperial Japanese Army's 3rd Division was not a participating force, even though some Western sources claimed the contary.[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Defense_of_Sihang_Warehouse#Japanese_Participating_Forces_-_Summary_as_of_2024-07-18 [4]] Since this was determined nearly two years ago, no other editors have since taken issue with the participating Japanese forces listed. In spite of this, Wahreit has arbitrarily readded  the incorrect claim of the 3rd Division's participation, despite it already being explained to them years ago.[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Defense_of_Sihang_Warehouse&diff=prev&oldid=1340648753 [5]] Even Stephen Robinson, who Wahreit relies on heavily as a source for this claim, has personally corresponded with me and agreed their inclusion of the 3rd Divison's involvement at Sihang Warehouse in their writing was incorrect. I am happy to send a copy of this correspondence to an administrator if necessary. 

While good faith should be assumed, just a month ago Wahreit went through a very arduous effort of collecting all of my negative interactions with them to try and have me banned, although it was ultimately unsuccessful.[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive1213#c-Wahreit-20260117062400-Harassment_and_Battleground_Behavior_from_User:Adachi1939 [6]] It would not be a stretch to say this user holds some kind of grudge against me and is engaged in deliberate harassment through their disruptive editing. [[User:Adachi1939|Adachi1939]] ([[User talk:Adachi1939|talk]]) 23:36, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

:This is now the third time @[[User:Adachi1939|Adachi1939]] is trying to get me banned for content disputes (the first two being unsuccessful).[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Wahreit#c-Adachi1939-20260117014300-Notice_of_edit_warring_noticeboard_discussion][https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Wahreit#c-Adachi1939-20240715220200-RfC_about_the_the_IJA_3rd_Division,_Defense_of_the_Sihang_Warehouse,_and_the_Bat]
:'''I joined that discussion because:'''
:- adachi badmouthed me unprovoked[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Yasuji_Okamura#c-Adachi1939-20260224010400-Adachi1939-20260223234300]
:- adachi was pushing "an actual number of victims" for the [[Nanjing Massacre]] (lower than page consensus) and repeatedly calling a documented genocide "so-called" and "alleged" (which constitutes ''[[Nanjing Massacre denial|Denial]]).'' Editor @[[User:RelmC|RelmC]] has taken issue with this too,[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Yasuji_Okamura#c-RelmC-20260117110200-Three_Alls] but adachi has continued to revert their contributions without consensus[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Yasuji_Okamura&diff=prev&oldid=1340080071]
:Rather than seek consensus per [[Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle|Bold-Revert-Discuss]], adachi has reverted everyone's edits to the page repeatedly[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Yasuji_Okamura&diff=prev&oldid=1340293295][https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Yasuji_Okamura&diff=prev&oldid=1340453392][https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Yasuji_Okamura&diff=prev&oldid=1340080071] and now escalated to WP:ANI for the third time.
:'''I now insist on a block for @[[User:Adachi1939|Adachi1939]] because:'''
:- adachi explicitly hounding me (by offering opposition to me, not content, across different pages) despite prior warnings from admins to stop[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Battle_of_Verdun#c-Adachi1939-20260116081100-Intothatdarkness-20260116022900]
:- adachi's repeated visits to my talk page to insult me[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Wahreit#c-Adachi1939-20250403222000-Adachi1939-20250402231000][https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Wahreit#c-Adachi1939-20240713053100-the_adachi_guy_challenge][https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Wahreit#c-Adachi1939-20240715220200-RfC_about_the_the_IJA_3rd_Division,_Defense_of_the_Sihang_Warehouse,_and_the_Bat]
:- adachi's repeated attempts to get me banned without discussion, and edit warring [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Wahreit#c-Adachi1939-20260117014300-Notice_of_edit_warring_noticeboard_discussion][https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Wahreit#c-Adachi1939-20240715220200-RfC_about_the_the_IJA_3rd_Division,_Defense_of_the_Sihang_Warehouse,_and_the_Bat]
:- adachi's continued reliance on personal attacks (despite prior warnings and blocks from admins) [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Three_Alls_policy#c-Adachi1939-20260116054400-Wahreit-20260116021900][https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Battle_of_Shanghai#c-Adachi1939-20240715053500-Wahreit-20240715044700][https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Adachi1939#c-Adachi1939-20260117064100-Wahreit-20260117062500][https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Three_Alls_policy#c-Adachi1939-20260116212300-Wahreit-20260116205000][https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Three_Alls_policy#c-Adachi1939-20260116215600-Wahreit-20260116214800]
:It is getting tiresome coming back to this page over and over again to defend myself because adachi won't resolve content disagreements. adachi has never been of any interest, I only edit wikipedia for the readers. [[User:Wahreit|Wahreit]] ([[User talk:Wahreit|talk]]) 01:00, 2 March 2026 (UTC)
::also, adachi seems to "gain satisfaction" from making people angry and upset, per his own admission[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Adachi1939#c-Adachi1939-20230512101300-203.221.62.213-20230512093400]. Just some food for thought. [[User:Wahreit|Wahreit]] ([[User talk:Wahreit|talk]]) 01:00, 2 March 2026 (UTC)
::''>>adachi badmouthed me unprovoked''
::Referencing the Chinese version of Wikipedia article, Wahreit wrote a completely different statement in English while citing the same Chinese source, as already explained above.[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Three_Alls_policy#Article_content_inconsistent_with_source [1]] This is not unprovoked "badmouthing", they have engaged in academic dishonesty and it was directly relevant to the discussion. The fact Wahreit has not only engaged in such academic dishonesty, but still refuses to acknowledge it nor take responsibility, should be more than enough reason to have their editing rights revoked. 
::''>>adachi was pushing "an actual number of victims" for the Nanjing Massacre (lower than page consensus)''
::This is rather disingenuous. I wrote:
::{{blockquote|text=Modern scholarship on the Nanjing Massacre, such as Wakabayashi's The Nanking Atrocity, 1937-1938 estimates the actual number of victims to range from 100,000–200,000 POWs and civilians killed}}
::The actual Nanjing Massacre article states "newer estimates adhere to a death toll between 100,000 and 200,000" citing the same source.[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nanjing_Massacre#cite_ref-:18_3-1 [2]] 
::''>>repeatedly calling a documented genocide "so-called" and "alleged"''
::Again this is disingenuous, I have not denied a genocide. I called the term "Three Alls policy" "alleged" and "so-called" as it does not exist in Japanese documents, the very sources cited in the article on it state it was a term created by the Chinese Communist Party to criticize Japan's brutal annihilation/pacification operations.[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Yasuji_Okamura#c-Adachi1939-20260224230600-Katzrockso-20260218013900 [3]] I have never denied the Japanese military flagrantly committed atrocities during these campaigns, only questioned the terminology and who was actually responsible.  
::''>>adachi has continued to revert their [RelmC's] contributions without consensus''
::RelmC expressed doubts with my contributions adhering to the academic consensus, largely due to confusion stemming from Wahreit writing a fictious claim on the Three Alls policy article as already mentioned above. After clarifying this,[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Yasuji_Okamura#c-Adachi1939-20260223234300-Adachi1939-20260223211700 [4]] I readded the changes and have not received further input from RelmC. I don't know why Wahreit thinks they are entitled to speak on behalf of this editor who has so far expressed no further concerns. 
::''>>adachi explicitly hounding me (by offering opposition to me, not content, across different pages) despite prior warnings from admins to stop''
::While the hounding is true, the allegation I was already warned to not do so is false. Wahreit's cited example occurred on Jan 16 2026. I was warned on Jan 19 2026 to stop.[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive1213#c-Toadspike-20260119200900-Wahreit-20260119194100 [5]] I have since stopped, however as seen above Wahreit has not. 
::''>>adachi's repeated visits to my talk page to insult me''
::All of these are old examples which have already been discussed on the Administrator's noticeboard before and are missing the context that in said noticeboard discussions, they were found to be guilty of the same behavior. An administrator noted about Wahreit:
::{{blockquote|text=I am extremely unimpressed with your behavior. You seem to be arranging inappropriate offwiki coordination with another editor against "a certain guy". It's hardly harassment for that "guy" to then show up to the conversation.}}
::Another user wrote of Wahreit:[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Alexysun#c-TylerBurden-20260131094000-Wahreit-20260131040200 [6]]
::{{blockquote|text=does @Wahreit think talk pages are exempt of WP:CIVIL? The only embarrassing behavior I see is from you [Wahreit].}}
::''>>adachi's repeated attempts to get me banned''
::Nowhere in these examples did I explicitly ask for Wahreit to be banned. I was requesting admin intervention for measures to be taken against their disruptive behavior. Perhaps Wahreit is unaware that an alternative to being banned is simply not engaging in prolonged disruptive behavior. 
::''>>adachi's continued reliance on personal attacks''
::As already discussed above, pointing out someone's poor conduct doesn't necessarily mean it's a personal attack. In the numerous examples Wahreit has cited, they have take responsibility for their misconduct in zero of them.
::>>also, adachi seems to "gain satisfaction" from making people angry and upset, per his own admission
::The full context here is that I was gaining satisfaction from the anger someone suffered as a consequence of their own stupidity. For that I am guilty as charged. [[User:Adachi1939|Adachi1939]] ([[User talk:Adachi1939|talk]]) 02:09, 2 March 2026 (UTC)
:::>>>''The full context here is that I was gaining satisfaction from the anger someone suffered as a '''consequence of their own stupidity'''. For that I am guilty as charged.''
:::@[[User:Adachi1939|Adachi1939]] admits the truth on how he interacts with and treats newcomers. Just appalling.
:::>>>'''''While the hounding is true''', the allegation I was already warned to not do so is false''
:::adachi admits to hounding me. And he '''was''' warned previously by an admin here to not to hound me:[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive1165#c-Liz-20240827083500-Adachi1939-20240826045300] Then he was warned again recently[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#c-Toadspike-20260119200900-Wahreit-20260119194100] He still has refused to stop.
:::>>>''Nowhere in these examples did I explicitly ask for Wahreit to be banned. I was requesting admin intervention for measures to be taken against their disruptive behavior.''
:::No. He did. Here: [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive1165#c-Adachi1939-20240827014600-Timtrent-20240826093700][https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Edit_warring#c-Adachi1939-20260117052000-Wahreit-20260117035300] 
:::So adachi has just admitted to hounding me ''and'' has not stopped despite two previous warnings. He has been blocked already for edit-warring twice too (see his block log). He gains satisfaction from "the anger from other people's stupidity" as he calls it. 
:::I really do believe the wiki community would benefit from a long block on adachi. [[User:Wahreit|Wahreit]] ([[User talk:Wahreit|talk]]) 02:33, 2 March 2026 (UTC)
::::hey just popping in here. What happened?? It doesn't look like any of you are in the right judging by what I see, it's better if we get someone here now [[User:Raizief|Raizief]] ([[User talk:Raizief|talk]]) 02:58, 2 March 2026 (UTC)
:::::@[[User:Adachi1939|Adachi1939]] has escalated to WP:ANI for the third time over a content issue, seeking to get me banned. He didn't try getting a consensus on a talk page or discuss substantially. 
:::::Adachi's also been hounding me across Wikipedia despite previous warnings from admins. I am bored of having to come here every time adachi disagrees with me. I'll let the diffs speak the truth.  [[User:Wahreit|Wahreit]] ([[User talk:Wahreit|talk]]) 03:19, 2 March 2026 (UTC)
::::''>>No. He did. Here: ''
::::My apologies if I missed them, but looking over these two examples I don't see any examples where I explicitly called for Wahreit to be banned.
::::At this point I am fairly certain they lack the ability to engage in a constructive manner with me but that doesn't necessarily mean they need a sitewide ban, just blocking their editing privileges on a few articles could probably help. [[User:Adachi1939|Adachi1939]] ([[User talk:Adachi1939|talk]]) 03:10, 2 March 2026 (UTC)
:::::If you two want someone to assist a good first step would be to stop going back and forth with each other. [[Special:Contributions/&#126;2026-13567-93|&#126;2026-13567-93]] ([[User talk:&#126;2026-13567-93|talk]]) 16:26, 2 March 2026 (UTC)
:I support an interaction ban between these two editors. Both of them continually increase the temperature of discussions I have witnessed and seemingly have no ability to stop insulting each other or personalizing the dispute. 
:See {{tq|throwing juvenile tantrums and begging desperately (and unsuccessfully) for the admins to ban me}} [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Defense_of_Sihang_Warehouse&diff=prev&oldid=1341866357]
:and {{tq|This is perhaps the most disingenuous statement I've ever witnessed from an editor on this site.}} [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Defense_of_Sihang_Warehouse&diff=prev&oldid=1341928826]
:for recent examples. [[User:Katzrockso|Katzrockso]] ([[User talk:Katzrockso|talk]]) 02:20, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
::'''Comment:''' These two have been edit warring at [[Defense of Sihang Warehouse]] for two years now. Wahreit canvassed me three times on my talk page for my input but I've ignored it until now with the exception of some deletions of unsourced content back in [https://sigma.toolforge.org/usersearch.py?name=Qiushufang&page=Defense+of+Sihang+Warehouse&server=enwiki&max= May 2024]. Their main contention seems to be that Wahreit mainly uses secondary or tertiary sources that have a Chinese bias while Adachi favors primary Japanese sources that have a Japanese bias. It wasn't until today that I noticed that Adachi is deleting pieces of the article based on the false premise of [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Defense_of_Sihang_Warehouse&diff=prev&oldid=1342677747 failed verification], which they then [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Defense_of_Sihang_Warehouse&diff=prev&oldid=1342680029 reverted with an explanation to see talk page]. There is obviously no consensus on the talk page since Wahreit and Adachi are still fighting each other, and I don't much any mention of the source involved (Harmsen), so I'm not sure what looking at talk page is supposed to do. I suggest a topic ban for both Wahreit and Adachi from WW2 articles, particularly Adachi for the [[Second Sino-Japanese War]], since this has been ongoing for years now. Looking at Adachi's history, they have been edit warring with multiple users [https://sigma.toolforge.org/usersearch.py?name=Adachi1939&page=Defense+of+Sihang+Warehouse&max=500&server=enwiki since 2023]. [[User:Qiushufang|Qiushufang]] ([[User talk:Qiushufang|talk]]) 05:24, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
:::'''Response:''' Sorry if my reasoning in the edits was not clear, all of these passages in some way did fail verification, please see my explanation on the talk page. [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Defense_of_Sihang_Warehouse#Removal_of_failed_verification_passages]
:::The issue with Wahreit is not that they use sources biased towards China, it is that they are using objectively bad sources, including ones that have either copied or outright plagiarized Wikipedia to assert completely false notions like an entire extra Japanese division being involved.[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard#Warfare_History_Network_/_Eric_Niderost] 
:::If it was just Wahreit's poor sources being the problem, it would not be so much of an issue. They have been distorting sources for years.
:::[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Defense_of_Sihang_Warehouse&diff=next&oldid=1242077543 Ex. 1] Source says "The Chinese officers ordered their men to fire. Five Japanese soldiers went down" Wahreit writes "Five Japanese soldiers were killed instantly by gunfire"
:::Did these Japanese soldiers die? Likely, but it is not explicitly stated in the original text. 
:::[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Defense_of_Sihang_Warehouse&diff=next&oldid=1242077543 Ex. 2] Source says Japanese "brought forward tankettes", Wahreit changes it to "five Type 94 Te-Ke tankettes, who Yang Ruifu observed advancing down the road." Cited source made no reference to the number of tankettes nor Yang Ruifu observing them (he's not mentioned in the source article at all).
:::[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Defense_of_Sihang_Warehouse&diff=prev&oldid=1234715740 Ex. 3] Source only lists one Japanese serviceman as fatally wounded near Sihang Warehouse, Wahreit adds false claim to article that it said "two" died. 
:::If the issues with these poor sources and Wahreit adding false/misleading/embellished information unsupported by their sources could have been handled years ago when it started, none of this would have ever escalated to this mess. Yes I do edit the Sihang Warehouse article a lot because the article sucks and needs a lot of work, especially due to disruptive editors like Wahreit and people that keep reverting problematic content back into it. [[User:Adachi1939|Adachi1939]] ([[User talk:Adachi1939|talk]]) 05:57, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
::::[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard#Warfare_History_Network_/_Eric_Niderost Other people seem to disagree] with your interpretation of bad sources or plagiarism per [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard#c-Katzrockso-20260307092100-Adachi1939-20260307052500 explanation] by {{user|Katzrockso}}. [[User:Qiushufang|Qiushufang]] ([[User talk:Qiushufang|talk]]) 06:10, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
:::::I appreciate all the input Katzrockso has given me, but their judgement is off on this one. Also that's only a single opinion. 
:::::Not even getting into the misinformation of this article, the signs of plagiarism are damning. This type of content has no place on the Web let alone Wikipedia. Just look at the comparisons:
:::::: [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Defense_of_Sihang_Warehouse&oldid=150136480#Imperial_Japanese_Army 07:17, 9 August 2007 revision of the Defense of Sihang Warehouse Article:]
:::::: The Japanese 3rd Division (one of the most elite IJA divisions at the time)..." "...enjoyed air and naval superiority, as well as access to armoured vehicles, likely Type 94 Te-Ke tankettes, and also Type 89 mortars."
:::::: [https://warfarehistorynetwork.com/article/chinese-alamo-last-stand-at-sihang-warehouse/ Niderost, Dec 2007:]
:::::: "The Sihang defenders faced the Japanese 3rd Division, considered one of the best of the Imperial Japanese Army. They also had mortar teams, artillery, and armor—probably Type 94 Te-Ke tankettes."
:::::No web results other than the Wiki when searching "mint godown" before:2007-12-31:
:::::: [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Defense_of_Sihang_Warehouse&oldid=150136480#Imperial_Japanese_Army 07:17, 9 August 2007 revision of the Defense of Sihang Warehouse Article:]
:::::: "known also as the Chinese Mint Godown by those from the concessions"
:::::: [https://warfarehistorynetwork.com/article/chinese-alamo-last-stand-at-sihang-warehouse/ Niderost, Dec 2007:]
:::::: "Westerners knew the place as the Chinese Mint Godown."
:::::Strange small detail for both to include:
:::::: [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Defense_of_Sihang_Warehouse&oldid=150136480#Imperial_Japanese_Army 07:17, 9 August 2007 revision of the Defense of Sihang Warehouse Article:]
:::::: "the defenders did not have a flag pole in the warehouse. Therefore, the flag was hoisted on a makeshift pole made of two bamboo culms tied together."
:::::: [https://warfarehistorynetwork.com/article/chinese-alamo-last-stand-at-sihang-warehouse/ Niderost, Dec 2007:]
:::::: "Because there was no flagpole, two bamboo poles were lashed together for the purpose."
:::::These two paragraphs are nearly identical in their content:
::::::: [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Defense_of_Sihang_Warehouse&oldid=150136480#Imperial_Japanese_Army 07:17, 9 August 2007 revision of the Defense of Sihang Warehouse Article:]
::::::: "Attacking from all directions with cannon fire and tankettes, they pushed the 3rd Company out of their defensive line at the base of the warehouse and forced the 3rd into the warehouse itself. The west side of the warehouse originally lacked windows (as can be seen from the photos above), but the Japanese attacks conveniently opened up firing holes for the defenders. A group of Japanese soldiers tried to scale the walls to the second floor with ladders, and Xie just happened to be at the window they appeared from. He grabbed the first Japanese soldier's rifle, choked him with the other hand, pushed him off, and finally shot another Japanese soldier on the ladder before pushing the ladder off.
::::::: [https://warfarehistorynetwork.com/article/chinese-alamo-last-stand-at-sihang-warehouse/ Niderost, Dec 2007:]
::::::: "The west side of the building lacked windows, but Japanese shell hits had punched enough gaps into the wall to provide the defenders with loopholes. The Japanese, acting in concert with infantry, then brought forward tankettes. The fighting grew so heavy the Chinese Third Company was pushed back from its position and forced into the warehouse. Japanese infantry came forward with scaling ladders, a curious throwback in an age of mechanized war. The Chinese simply pushed the ladders off or peppered the advancing enemy with rifle and machine-gun fire. Xie personally lent a hand, fighting alongside his men.
:::::: If we break down the Wiki article's sentences it's essentially the following: [Concept 1 - Japanese attack with tankettes → push back Chinese 3rd Company] → [Concept 2 - West side attacked by Japanese → loopholes made for Chinese Defenders], → [Concept 3 - Japanese try to scale walls with ladders → Chinese resist → Xie personally stops them]
:::::: Looking at Niderost's paragraph, we can see the same content just paraphrased and rearranged, his is just constructed as [Concept 2] → [Concept 1] → [Concept 3].
:::::[[User:Adachi1939|Adachi1939]] ([[User talk:Adachi1939|talk]]) 06:20, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
::::::I now support a topic ban for blatant [[WP:BLP]] violations despite previous warnings. [[User:Katzrockso|Katzrockso]] ([[User talk:Katzrockso|talk]]) 17:52, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
:::::::Definition of plagariasm as per Chabot College where the author in question is a faculty member [https://www.chabotcollege.edu/accreditation/exhibits/standard%20iib/iib3.4b_conduct.pdf]
:::::::{{blockquote|text=The term "plagiarism" includes, but is not limited to, the use, by paraphrase or direct quotation, of the published or unpublished work or another person without full and clear acknowledgement}}
:::::::{{blockquote|text=Plagiarism includes the deliberate misrepresentation of someone else's works and ideas, as one's own, as well as '''paraphrasing without footnoting the source.'''}}
:::::::Per both Wikipedia's definition and Chabot College's definition no violation of WP:BLP has occcured. On the contrary, attempting to surpress these very real issues with academic misconduct is saddening to see. [[User:Adachi1939|Adachi1939]] ([[User talk:Adachi1939|talk]]) 21:00, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
:::::::I concur. Look at Adachi's [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Yasuji_Okamura&action=history edit history] at [[Yasuji Okamura]] where they repeatedly edit warred with {{user|RelmC}} and {{user|Wahreit}} over the course of three months. I also just noticed Katzrockso's involvement at the talk page there, so they should know the extent of the issue better than I do. A logged out edit just coincidentally [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Defense_of_Sihang_Warehouse&diff=prev&oldid=1342695240 reverted me] after I warned Adachi of [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Adachi1939&diff=prev&oldid=1342684777 edit warring]. [[User:Qiushufang|Qiushufang]] ([[User talk:Qiushufang|talk]]) 12:30, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
:::::::Wow this goes back even further than I thought. Note that even before [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Yasuji_Okamura#c-Katzrockso-20260219014600-Adachi1939-20260218045900 Katz had advized Adachi] to edit the [[Three Alls]] article, they had already done that back in [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Three_Alls_policy&action=history December 2025], eventually involving Wahreit as well as RelmC. [[User:Qiushufang|Qiushufang]] ([[User talk:Qiushufang|talk]]) 12:40, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
:::Wow I had forgotten that I was involved in this two years ago at [[Battle of Shanghai]]. See my comments on the issue [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Battle_of_Shanghai#c-Qiushufang-20240713071800-Adachi1939-20240713070500 here] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Battle_of_Shanghai#c-Qiushufang-20240715234100-Adachi1939-20240715215500 here]. I even predicted that none of the issues would be fixed because the users involved keep on using non-English primary sources that hardly anyone can verify. [[Defense of Sihang Warehouse]] has not improved to this day. The article is still ridden with primary sources, broken sources, and incomplete sources, all issues that had been templated for improvement. Adachi's most [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Defense_of_Sihang_Warehouse&diff=prev&oldid=1343125423 recent edit] even [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defense_of_Sihang_Warehouse#References broke a bunch of sources]. [[User:Qiushufang|Qiushufang]] ([[User talk:Qiushufang|talk]]) 13:28, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
::::Thank you for your work fixing the Defense of Sihang page after my edits. I am going to go through soon and fix as well as better organize all of the citations. [[User:Adachi1939|Adachi1939]] ([[User talk:Adachi1939|talk]]) 20:32, 12 March 2026 (UTC)