Editing
Talk:Ethics of artificial intelligence
(section)
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Copyright and other issues related to the source material of LLM:s and other such systems based on large datasets == Should a chapter conserning copyright and other issues with the ownership and value of the source data of AI models based on large data sets be added? It is not a traditional topic of AI ethics but is very relevant to the current wave of generative AI. Certainly this topic has raised a lot of discussion, and for a reason. This wave of generative AI has been lauded as revolutionary and gained a ton of investments, but the invaluable source material has been collected in somewhat controversial ways, at least in the eyes of some people. [[Special:Contributions/176.72.38.230|176.72.38.230]] ([[User talk:176.72.38.230|talk]]) 16:17, 12 June 2024 (UTC) :@[[User:176.72.38.230|176.72.38.230]] That would be a matter of finding reliable secondary sources (see [[WP:RS]]) to support such a section. Keep in mind that RS discussion of copyright ''legal'' issues would not necessarily support a section here relating to the ''ethics'' of AI. [[User:WeyerStudentOfAgrippa|WeyerStudentOfAgrippa]] ([[User talk:WeyerStudentOfAgrippa|talk]]) 18:53, 12 June 2024 (UTC) ::@[[User:WeyerStudentOfAgrippa|WeyerStudentOfAgrippa]] Yes, you're right about sourcing. However, copyright and other issues conserning the ownership and value of training data are not solely legal issues. Theft, for example is a legal concept, but also ethical. Most consider it is unethical to steal. Theft is illegal because it is unethical! That is why I specifically wrote: "and other issues concerning the ownership of the source data". ::I believe many people have strong feelings about the current way of gathering data for generative AI not because they think it is illegal but because they feel it's morally wrong. The discussion however often revolves around the legal side because those people are trying to campaign for what they feel is moral, and in our society you have to argue via law. ::But I do not have time for finding sources and writing proper wikipedia text just now. I just wanted to throw this idea here. Wouldn't sources that show that a remarkable amount of people think there is something unethical in the way of collecting source data for AI be enough to show that this is an ethical consern with AI? [[Special:Contributions/176.72.38.230|176.72.38.230]] ([[User talk:176.72.38.230|talk]]) 19:07, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Eurovision Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Eurovision Wiki:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Navigation menu
Personal tools
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Namespaces
Page
Discussion
English
Views
Read
Edit source
Add topic
View history
More
Search
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Page information