Editing
Eurovision Wiki:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents
(section)
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== ProsePioneer mass deletion of sourced content on Pakol article == User ProsePioneer removed -5,678 characters of sourced academic content from the Pakol article in a series of rapid undos between 14:45 and 15:00. Diff link: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pakol&diff=prev&oldid=1343639944 The removed content was supported by: - Kingsley (1981), "The Cap that Survived Alexander", American Journal of Archaeology - Cambridge History of Iran, Vol.3(1), ed. Yarshater, Cambridge University Press - Richard N. Frye, "The History of Ancient Iran", Verlag C.H. Beck ProsePioneer justified the removal by claiming the content was "based on a single journalistic source" which is factually incorrect given the academic sources listed above. This appears to be a pattern of nationalist bias removing legitimate sourced content about the Greco-Bactrian and Afghan historical connection to the pakol. I request administrator review of this mass deletion. [[Special:Contributions/~2026-16412-75|~2026-16412-75]] ([[User talk:~2026-16412-75|talk]]) 08:51, 16 March 2026 (UTC) :<Small>I've posted the required notice [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:ProsePioneer#c-Nil_NZ-20260316090500-March_2026 to their talk page]. [[User:Nil NZ|<span style="color:#000;font-family:Comic Sans MS;border-radius:20px;background-color:#8ACE00;padding:4px 7px 5px 7px">nil</span>]]<sup> [[User talk:Nil NZ|<span style="color:#000">nz</span>]]</sup> 09:08, 16 March 2026 (UTC)</small> :This seems like a content issue, not conduct, and should be discussed on the relevant Talk page (I see you have started a discussion there, good job!). Admins don't decide upon / "review" content issues.{{pb}}The general process of things on here is [[WP:BRD]]: ProsePioneer [[WP:BOLD]]y removed that, their edit was reverted by someone else, and now you can all discuss on the talk page to decide what is most appropriate. Someone making a [[WP:BOLD]] removal once (with a defensible justification) doesn't rise to the level of something that requires an ANI post. <span style="color:blue; font-variant:small-caps; font-family:Avenir,Arial,Comic Sans MS; font-size:125%">[[User:MolecularPilot|'''M'''olecular'''P'''ilot]][[User talk:MolecularPilot|<sup>'''Talk'''</sup>]]</span> 09:23, 16 March 2026 (UTC) ::Considering ProsePioneer has just come out of a two week block for edit warring on that very page, it definitely is a conduct issue if they've gone straight back into editing disruptively. [[User:Nil NZ|<span style="color:#000;font-family:Comic Sans MS;border-radius:20px;background-color:#8ACE00;padding:4px 7px 5px 7px">nil</span>]]<sup> [[User talk:Nil NZ|<span style="color:#000">nz</span>]]</sup> 09:28, 16 March 2026 (UTC) :::It isn't edit warring / DE at the moment, but we will see if they try to re-remove the disputed content or if they go to engage on Talk (which hopefully they will, having learned their lesson). That's why I think this ANI is a bit premature. I don't really see any conduct issue yet (the vague allegations of bias in the opening post notwithstanding), but I might have missed something. <span style="color:blue; font-variant:small-caps; font-family:Avenir,Arial,Comic Sans MS; font-size:125%">[[User:MolecularPilot|'''M'''olecular'''P'''ilot]][[User talk:MolecularPilot|<sup>'''Talk'''</sup>]]</span> 10:02, 16 March 2026 (UTC) :::@[[User:ProsePioneer|ProsePioneer]], in light of this, given the tensions over this article and [[Special:Diff/1343644060|other recent edits of yours]], would you commit to discuss your future edits to Pakistan-related articles before making them? This would be a voluntary commitment, logged at [[Wikipedia:Editing restrictions/Voluntary]], that would help prevent friction around these pages that may lead to another formal sanction. [[User:Chaotic Enby|<span style="color:#8a7500">Chaotic <span style="color:#9e5cb1">Enby</span></span>]] ([[User talk:Chaotic Enby|talk]] Β· [[Special:Contributions/Chaotic Enby|contribs]]) 10:02, 16 March 2026 (UTC) ::::To clarify, I'm not saying that your current edits will get you sanctioned if you don't accept it, but more as a precaution to avoid cases like this in the future that may build up against you. [[User:Chaotic Enby|<span style="color:#8a7500">Chaotic <span style="color:#9e5cb1">Enby</span></span>]] ([[User talk:Chaotic Enby|talk]] Β· [[Special:Contributions/Chaotic Enby|contribs]]) 10:05, 16 March 2026 (UTC) *There was massive support for topic ban from [[WP:CT/SA]] for this user during the last ANI. Given his disruption has continued, I believe he should be '''topic banned''' this time. [[User:Zalaraz|<span style="color:MidnightBlue;">Zalaraz</span>]] ([[User talk:Zalaraz|<span style="color:black; font-weight:bold;">talk</span>]]) 03:52, 17 March 2026 (UTC) *:{{courtesy link}}[[WP:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1216#|WP:ANI / ProsePioneer - disruptive editing across CTOPS]] *:+ a link to AN/3RR discussing the aforementioned edit warring block above [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/3RRArchive505#User:ProsePioneer_reported_by_User:Anupam_(Result:_Partially_blocked_2_weeks)]. [[User:Nil NZ|<span style="color:#000;font-family:Comic Sans MS;border-radius:20px;background-color:#8ACE00;padding:4px 7px 5px 7px">nil</span>]]<sup> [[User talk:Nil NZ|<span style="color:#000">nz</span>]]</sup> 04:02, 17 March 2026 (UTC) *'''Support''' Indefinite topic ban from CT/SA. Enough is enough. <span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS; font-size:100; style=color:blue"> '''THEZDRX'''</span> <span style="font-family:Arial; font-size:92; style=color:black"><sub>([[User:ZDRX|User]]) | </sub></span><sub>([[User talk:ZDRX|Contact]])</sub> 15:45, 18 March 2026 (UTC) *'''Support''' Indefinite topic ban from the [[WP:CT/SA]] area. I'd argue it should have been done last time, but better late than never. All the two weeks bought us was two weeks' respite of this particular source of nationalist editing. [[User:CoffeeCrumbs|CoffeeCrumbs]] ([[User talk:CoffeeCrumbs|talk]]) 04:48, 19 March 2026 (UTC)
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Eurovision Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Eurovision Wiki:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Navigation menu
Personal tools
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Namespaces
Project page
Discussion
English
Views
Read
Edit source
View history
More
Search
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Page information