Editing Eurovision Wiki:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents (section)

== Repeated removal of sourced content related to Lucky Bisht by user Kingsmasher678 ==
{{atop
| status = Boomerang

| result = Blocked for 31 hours for continued LLM use. Notified of SA CTOP. [[User:Voorts|voorts]] ([[User talk:Voorts|talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Voorts|contributions]]) 18:35, 16 March 2026 (UTC)
}}
{{cait}}
Hello,

I would like to request that administrators please review the editing pattern of the user Kingsmasher678 on pages related to Lucky Bisht.

For several weeks now, Kingsmasher678 has repeatedly removed references and sourced information related to Lucky Bisht from multiple pages. In many cases the removed content was supported by independent media sources and reliable news publications.

These removals appear to be happening repeatedly across different edits and pages, which makes it difficult to maintain stable and well-sourced content. Attempts to discuss the matter on the talk page have not resolved the issue so far.

Because of this repeated pattern of removing sourced material, I respectfully request that an administrator review the editing activity of Kingsmasher678 and determine whether it follows Wikipedia’s policies regarding consensus, reliable sources, and collaborative editing.

Thank you for your time.

[[User:Spider1217|Spider1217]] ([[User talk:Spider1217|talk]]) 17:20, 16 March 2026 (UTC)
{{caib}}
:Diffs? [[User:EditorShane3456|shane]] [[User talk: EditorShane3456|(talk to me if you want!)]] 17:29, 16 March 2026 (UTC)
{{cait}}
::Hello,
::The concern is that a large amount of sourced material was removed from the Lucky Bisht page. Several reliable Indian news sources were removed in those edits, including coverage about the reported Bigg Boss 18 offer and reports about threats against him that were covered by national media outlets.
::I will collect and provide the diffs showing where these sources and references were removed.
::[[User:Spider1217|Spider1217]] ([[User talk:Spider1217|talk]]) 17:44, 16 March 2026 (UTC)
::Hello,
::My concern is that this doesn’t seem to be a one-time removal. Looking at the edit history, similar removals related to Lucky Bisht appear to go back to earlier edits as well, including around 2024.
::In the recent edits, a large amount of sourced material was removed together. Many of those references were from established Indian news outlets, so it was not content based on a single source.
::The book that was mentioned is also not an autobiography. It is a non-fiction biography written by journalist S. Hussain Zaidi and published by Simon & Schuster. However, the article content was supported by multiple independent news reports as well, which is why several citations were included.
::If there are specific sentences or sources that you believe should not be included, it would be helpful to point them out so they can be reviewed individually instead of removing a large set of sourced material at once.
::[[User:Spider1217|Spider1217]] ([[User talk:Spider1217|talk]]) 17:51, 16 March 2026 (UTC)
{{caib}}
::: {{ping|Spider1217}} If you continue to use LLMs to communicate, you will be blocked. See [[WP:LLMTALK]]. [[User:Voorts|voorts]] ([[User talk:Voorts|talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Voorts|contributions]]) 17:54, 16 March 2026 (UTC)
:Next time, alert me, as is required for these matters.
:@[[User:EditorShane3456|EditorShane3456]], he is referring to this edit here. [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lucky_Bisht&diff=1343692466&oldid=1343689295]
:[[User:Kingsmasher678|<span style="color:green;">'''Kingsmasher678'''</span>]] ([[User talk:Kingsmasher678|<span style="color:black;">'''talk'''</span>]]) 17:35, 16 March 2026 (UTC)
{{ping|Spider1217}} you may not edit that article, and may only make edit requests on the talk page as per the tagging. It is under extended-confirmed restriction and your account does not have extended-confirmed status as yet. [[User:Canterbury Tail|<b style="color: Blue;">Canterbury Tail</b>]] [[User talk:Canterbury Tail|<i style="color: Blue;">talk</i>]] 17:39, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

:To be fair to him, that wasn't clear until yesterday. He has failed to follow that guideline on [[List of snipers]], and he has been warned by myself and others about these restrictions.
:[[User:Kingsmasher678|<span style="color:green;">'''Kingsmasher678'''</span>]] ([[User talk:Kingsmasher678|<span style="color:black;">'''talk'''</span>]]) 17:41, 16 March 2026 (UTC)
{{cait}}
::Hello,
::My concern is simply about the removal of a large number of sourced references from the article. Many of those citations were from established Indian news outlets, including The Hindu and other national publications.If any specific sources or sentences are problematic under Wikipedia policy, it would be helpful to identify them individually so they can be reviewed and improved, rather than removing a large set of references at once.
::I am open to discussion and would like the article to remain well-sourced and balanced.
::[[User:Spider1217|Spider1217]] ([[User talk:Spider1217|talk]]) 17:53, 16 March 2026 (UTC)
{{caib}}
{{hat|duplicates}}
=== Repeated removal of sourced content related to Lucky Bisht by user Kingsmasher678 ===
{{atop
| result = There's already a discussion open above. It's already been explained to you why the content was removed. If you continue to post AI-generated reports and repeat the same claims over and over, you will be blocked. [[User:Voorts|voorts]] ([[User talk:Voorts|talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Voorts|contributions]]) 17:44, 16 March 2026 (UTC)
}}
{{cait}}
Hello,

I would like to request an administrative review of the editing pattern of the user Kingsmasher678 on pages related to Lucky Bisht.

Over a period of time, this editor has repeatedly removed sourced material and references related to Lucky Bisht from multiple pages. In several cases, the removed content was supported by independent and established news sources, including national media publications.

In addition, looking at the editing history and past discussions, it appears that this editor has been involved in similar removals and disputes related to the same topic since at least 2024. This suggests a possible pattern of behavior where sourced information connected to the same subject is repeatedly challenged or removed across different edits.

The concern here is not about a single content disagreement. Content disputes are normal on Wikipedia. However, when sourced material supported by independent reliable sources is repeatedly removed without clear policy-based reasoning, it becomes difficult to maintain stable and verifiable content.

I respectfully request that an administrator review the editing pattern in this case and determine whether it is consistent with Wikipedia’s policies regarding reliable sourcing (WP:RS), verifiability (WP:V), and collaborative editing.

If any specific parts of the content require improvement or better sourcing, I am open to discussion and consensus-building on the talk page. My intention is simply to ensure that the article remains stable, neutral, and properly sourced.

Thank you for your time.

[[User:Spider1217|Spider1217]] ([[User talk:Spider1217|talk]]) 17:39, 16 March 2026 (UTC)
{{caib}}
{{abot}}

=== Removal of sourced content about Lucky Bisht on List of snipers by Kingsmasher678 ===
{{hat|Please stop opening more threads about the same issue. [[User:Chaotic Enby|<span style="color:#8a7500">Chaotic <span style="color:#9e5cb1">Enby</span></span>]] ([[User talk:Chaotic Enby|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Chaotic Enby|contribs]]) 18:02, 16 March 2026 (UTC)}}
Hello,

I would like to point out a related issue concerning edits made by the user Kingsmasher678 on the "List of snipers" page.

The entry mentioning Lucky Bisht previously included references from reliable Indian news sources, including coverage from The Hindu and other national media outlets. During edits made by Kingsmasher678, those references and related content appear to have been removed.

Because similar removals of sourced material related to Lucky Bisht have occurred across more than one page, including both the Lucky Bisht article and the List of snipers page, I wanted to note that this may represent a pattern affecting multiple articles.

If any specific sources are considered problematic under Wikipedia policy, it would be helpful to identify them individually so they can be reviewed and improved.

Thank you.

[[User:Spider1217|Spider1217]] ([[User talk:Spider1217|talk]]) 17:59, 16 March 2026 (UTC)
{{hab}}
{{hab}}
{{abot}}
*Just to point out: once the 31-hour block expired, this person went right back to doing the same thing again, and is now indeffed. The 31-hour block was a mistake; indef should have been immediate as soon as they posted here using AI. There is no salvaging such people. They must be relentlessly purged, without mercy. [[User:EEng#s|<b style="color:red;">E</b>]][[User talk:EEng#s|<b style="color:blue;">Eng</b>]] 03:10, 19 March 2026 (UTC)