Editing Eurovision Wiki:WikiProject AI Cleanup/Noticeboard (section)

== [[Order of the Knights of the Fiery Cross]] ==

{{AIC status
| cleanup_status = requested
| tracking_subpage = 
}} <!--  Valid statuses: requested, ongoing, unnecessary, completed. Update if needed!  -->
Just removed an ChatGPT-generated image from this article; a lot of the text seems likely to be AI-generated as well. [[User:Omphalographer|Omphalographer]] ([[User talk:Omphalographer|talk]]) 03:59, 29 January 2026 (UTC)

:The article prose largely seems human-written, with a couple of exceptions. I removed some of it, other parts I wouldn't want to touch without a full source review. I would say the article is largely fine, or at least doesn't give any glowing red flags, but I'll leave this tagged as cleanup requested in case anyone with a little more time wants to do a full source discrepancy check. [[User:Athanelar|Athanelar]] ([[User talk:Athanelar|talk]]) 17:46, 29 January 2026 (UTC)
::Pretty sure it's all AI. From late 2025 on AI text presents differently, although this does have a few straggler signs -- ''emphasizing'' which is one of the last vocab holdouts from the GPT-4o era; the See Also section of random high-level crap, some stuff that seems like faint vestiges of the "undue emphasis on coverage" smell, etc. Plus just common sense that if you're already adding an AI-generated image you're more likely to use AI for text as well. GPTZero agrees with me on this fwiw.
::Sourcing is weird. Haven't found any major hallucinations in the public ones, but it's kind of all of the place. Source #7 is a blog post with screenshots of the newspaper articles from #8, #9, and #10, but which gets cited for which claim seems arbitrary. {{tq|contemporary reports in the United States variously described "thirty or forty" arrests}} is cited to #8 and #9, but it's a direct quote from #8. Which is only one article and not "variously"... but source #7, which isn't cited, does mention that "similar articles appeared in newspapers from throughout the region." (Although it doesn't mention what they are, their contents, or whether it's the same AP article syndicated.) There's some stuff that seems like it ''could'' be synthesizing the various articles, but without access to the books/journals, I can't confirm that. [[User:Gnomingstuff|Gnomingstuff]] ([[User talk:Gnomingstuff|talk]]) 00:30, 30 January 2026 (UTC)