Editing Eurovision Wiki talk:WikiProject Articles for creation (section)

== [[Draft:FAB (web browser)]] ==

I would like a second or third or fourth opinion on whether I took a reasonable action with regard to a draft title that needed disambiguation.  I looked at [[Draft:FAB]] briefly, and that title in article space is a redirect to the disambiguation page [[Fab]], which is a well-populated disambiguation page both as an acronym and as an abbreviation.  I tried to move it to [[Draft:FAB (web browser)]], and was told that there was already a page there.  I looked at the page, and saw that it was a draft about the same thing, but that it had been declined 6 times and then rejected.  I then checked the histories to see if this was a resubmission of the rejected draft, and concluded that this is a submission by a different editor in good standing, and that the rejection was not really of the topic but of the specific draft.  After some thought, I moved the rejected draft to [[Draft:FAB (web browser) (2)]] to leave it in limbo so that the new draft can be reviewed on its merits, rather than on the demerits of the rejected draft.  My question is whether other reviewers think that I took a reasonable action.  
[[User:Robert McClenon|Robert McClenon]] ([[User talk:Robert McClenon|talk]]) 20:49, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

:I don't see why this looks any less likely to be rejected, to you? -- [[User:Asilvering|asilvering]] ([[User talk:Asilvering|talk]]) 20:53, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
::To answer Robert's question, yes, that seems reasonable, given that it's a new editor making a new attempt. To answer asilvering's question (not directed at me of course, but w/e), not really; at the end of the day it probably doesn't matter where it is, was, or ever shall be, it will likely declined and/or rejected within a few attempts. [[User:Primefac|Primefac]] ([[User talk:Primefac|talk]]) 22:24, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
:::I wasn't reviewing it, but was just trying to move it into draft space, which is the usual place where drafts are reviewed.  I wanted it to be at least possible for another unrelated draft to be reviewed.  [[User:Robert McClenon|Robert McClenon]] ([[User talk:Robert McClenon|talk]]) 05:34, 10 March 2026 (UTC)