Editing Eurovision Wiki:WikiProject AI Cleanup/Noticeboard (section)

== [[User:Cdkvsdph]] ==

{{AIC status
| cleanup_status = completed
| tracking_subpage = 2026-02-06 Cdkvsdph
}} <!--  Valid statuses: requested, ongoing, unnecessary, completed. Update if needed!  -->

This user reverted draftification on some LLM-generated articles and [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Apakolu_Massacre&diff=prev&oldid=1336482926 removed template] on one, so bringing them here as AfD is not likely the solution for all of them.
*[[Capture of 20 Jewish Youths by Khalid ibn al-Walid (634 CE)]]: Only one source is cited for central claim, and it's an Arabic book not accessible for machine translation. Extensive [[WP:OR]] and [[WP:SYNTH]]. Several passages, especially "Significance", bear hallmarks of LLM-generated prose.
*[[2026 Boko Haram Sabon Gari killings]]. Numerous claims fail verification. 
*[[Apakolu Massacre]]. As with the "20 Jewish youths" article, most of the article and sources are background to puff out an article about a lightly sourced event. The [https://actualite.cd/index.php/2026/01/27/lubero-deplacements-massifs-de-la-population-au-lendemain-des-attaques-des-adf-ayant source] used to cite the central claim fails verification on several points; it's an article about an attack on Musenge, not Apakolu, and it does not mention the other place names the article does. The [https://www.newspressnow.com/ap/ap-world-news/2026/01/25/25-killed-in-attack-by-islamic-state-backed-group-in-eastern-congo-rights-group-says/ only source] that does mention these attacks attributes the news to a human rights group.
*[[2026 Chabad car ramming attack]]. Likely a notable topic, but prose seems AI-inflected and the citations don't line up with the material they're supposed to source. For example, the [https://www.wmtv15news.com/2026/01/29/driver-repeatedly-rams-car-into-chabad-headquarters-possible-hate-crime/ source] for {{tq|The attack occurred amid a broader rise in reported antisemitic incidents in the United States, prompting renewed calls from community leaders for increased security at houses of worship}} doesn't say anything about anti-semitic incidents or increased security needs.
*[[Draft:Kharab_Ashk_shelling]]. Once again, the central claim of an attack on Kharab Ashk does not appear in two of the four the sources used to make it ([https://thenewregion.com/posts/4396], [https://npasyria.com/en/119368/]), and the "Significance" section jumps out as AI-generated.
The difference between the smooth prose of the user's article contributions and the rocky prose of [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Cdkvsdph&diff=prev&oldid=1336495512 talk page comments] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:2026_Boko_Haram_Sabon_Gari_killings&diff=prev&oldid=1336481925 edit] [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Kharab_Ashk_shelling&diff=prev&oldid=133612805 summaries] also suggests there's some LLM use. Thanks for taking a look (and letting me know if I'm off-base in my assessment of AI's role here). [[User:Dclemens1971|Dclemens1971]] ([[User talk:Dclemens1971|talk]]) 03:34, 4 February 2026 (UTC)
{{cait}}
:'''Capture of 20 Jewish Youths by Khalid ibn al-Walid (634 CE).'''
:The concern raised here conflates sourcing limitations with policy violations. Wikipedia explicitly permits the use of non-English and non-digitized sources (WP:RS), and machine-translation accessibility is not a requirement. Early Islamic history frequently relies on single surviving Arabic chronicles, and the presence of one reliable historical source for a narrowly described event does not constitute WP:OR or WP:SYNTH absent the introduction of novel analysis, which has not been demonstrated here. If particular passages—such as the “Significance” section—are felt to overstate conclusions, that is a matter of weight and phrasing suitable for trimming or qualification, not draftification or deletion. Allegations of “LLM-generated prose” are not actionable under policy and do not establish unreliability.
:'''2026 Boko Haram Sabon Gari killings.'''
:The claim that “numerous statements fail verification” indicates citation gaps rather than non-notability or fabrication. Wikipedia policy requires that challenged material be supported by reliable sources (WP:V), not that all details be independently confirmed at the time of article creation. Reporting on Boko Haram violence often emerges through fragmented coverage, NGO reporting, or evolving casualty figures, all of which are routinely handled through attribution and subsequent cleanup. The appropriate remedy is to tag, source, or remove individual statements, not to treat the article as inherently invalid.
:'''Apakolu Massacre.'''
:The criticism here centers on alleged location mismatches and reliance on a human rights group for attribution. Neither issue is disqualifying. Attribution to human rights organizations is explicitly acceptable for conflict reporting, particularly in regions with limited on-the-ground journalism. If a cited source discusses nearby or related attacks rather than the precise village name used in the article, that suggests a need for clarification or renaming, not an inference of fabrication. Background context is permitted under WP:SUMMARYSTYLE and does not constitute “puffing” when clearly distinguished from the event itself.
:'''2026 Chabad car ramming attack.'''
:This topic appears facially notable, and the issues identified relate to citation alignment rather than substance. A sentence whose citation does not support a broader claim about antisemitic trends or security concerns should be corrected or removed, which is a routine editorial matter. Such mismatches are common across Wikipedia and are addressed through normal cleanup processes. They do not undermine the validity of the article as a whole nor suggest bad faith or automation.
:'''Draft: Kharab Ashk shelling.'''
:The concern that some sources do not explicitly mention Kharab Ashk again reflects citation precision issues, not hoaxing or original research. Conflict reporting often references clusters of villages or shifting frontlines, and early coverage may be imprecise. The solution is to tighten sourcing, adjust wording, or remove unsupported claims. Assertions that a “Significance” section appears AI-generated are stylistic judgments and not policy-based grounds for draftification absent demonstrable factual errors.
:'''General allegation of LLM use.'''
:Finally, the suggestion that differences between article prose and talk-page comments imply LLM usage is speculative and not probative. Wikipedia policy does not prohibit AI-assisted drafting, and writing style is not evidence of unreliability or misconduct. Editors routinely write more formally in articles than in discussions, and WP:AGF cautions against inferring intent from stylistic differences. Content should be evaluated on verifiability and sourcing, not presumed authorship method. [[User:Cdkvsdph|Cdkvsdph]] ([[User talk:Cdkvsdph|talk]]) 23:48, 5 February 2026 (UTC)
{{caib}}
:I've reported this at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Using an LLM to justify inappropriate LLM use]]. [[User:Thebiguglyalien|<span style="color:#487d30">Thebiguglyalien</span>]] ([[User talk:Thebiguglyalien|<span style="color:#714e2a">talk</span>]]) [[Special:Contributions/Thebiguglyalien|🛸]] 00:39, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
::Is anything you disagree with LLM? [[User:Cdkvsdph|Cdkvsdph]] ([[User talk:Cdkvsdph|talk]]) 00:49, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
::Editor is now blocked for {{tqq|Repeated use of LLM/AI to improperly create/write articles and then denying its very obvious usage.}} [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&logid=177164153] [[Special:Contributions/fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four|fifteen&nbsp;thousand&nbsp;two&nbsp;hundred&nbsp;twenty&nbsp;four]]&nbsp;([[User talk:fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four|talk]]) 02:17, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
:[[Wikipedia:WikiProject AI Cleanup/Noticeboard/2026-02-06 Cdkvsdph|Cleanup page]] created [[User:HurricaneZeta|<span style="background-color:#ffd98c; color:black">'''Hurricane'''</span>]][[User talk:HurricaneZeta|<span style="background-color:#ffd98c; color:black">'''Zeta'''</span>]]<sup>[[Special:Contributions/HurricaneZeta|C]]</sup> 01:28, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
::FYI, {{noping|Jklkjkj}} has moved most of these back to mainspace. SPI has been opened. [[User:Dclemens1971|Dclemens1971]] ([[User talk:Dclemens1971|talk]]) 03:53, 8 February 2026 (UTC)
:::[[Image:Symbol redirect vote2.svg|20px]]&nbsp;'''Courtesy link:'''&nbsp;{{#if:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jklkjkj|{{format linkr|1=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jklkjkj|2=}}}}. [[Special:Contributions/fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four|fifteen&nbsp;thousand&nbsp;two&nbsp;hundred&nbsp;twenty&nbsp;four]]&nbsp;([[User talk:fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four|talk]]) 04:14, 8 February 2026 (UTC)
::::Blocked as a confirmed sock of [[WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Famous editor123456|Famous editor123456]]. [[Special:Contributions/fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four|fifteen&nbsp;thousand&nbsp;two&nbsp;hundred&nbsp;twenty&nbsp;four]]&nbsp;([[User talk:fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four|talk]]) 00:47, 9 February 2026 (UTC)