Editing Eurovision Wiki talk:WikiProject Articles for creation (section)

==Newer reviewer comment gobbling up older reviewer comment==
*10 March 01:15: I [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft%3AThis_Is_Your_Mind_On_Plants&diff=1342640951&oldid=1342571339 post a reviewer comment] to [[Draft:This Is Your Mind On Plants]]. In terms of layout and markup, the comment is more than averagely elaborate. (I make no claim for the quality of its content.)
*10 March 10:22: Craighead2123 [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:This_Is_Your_Mind_On_Plants&diff=next&oldid=1342640951 edits the article]. The edit doesn't affect the reviewer comment.
*10 March 10:55: {{U|JustARandomSquid}} [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:This_Is_Your_Mind_On_Plants&diff=next&oldid=1342717116 declines the submission and adds a reviewer comment], thereby zapping much of my earlier comment.
*10 March 23:08: I [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:This_Is_Your_Mind_On_Plants&diff=next&oldid=1342721597 restore my earlier comment].
*10 March 23:27: I [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:This_Is_Your_Mind_On_Plants&diff=next&oldid=1342836689 add a reviewer comment], thereby zapping much of my earlier comment (the same chunk of it as before).
*10 March 23:32: I [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:This_Is_Your_Mind_On_Plants&diff=next&oldid=1342839319 restore my earlier comment].
I realize that ''My Mind Is on a Plant'' (specifically, coffee) ... but am I making more than one obvious blunder here? (The first blunder, or at best pigheadedness, is to restore the earlier comment a second time, when it's rather obviously doomed to a third unintended deletion.) Or am I stupidly triggering a known bug? -- [[User:Hoary|Hoary]] ([[User talk:Hoary|talk]]) 23:58, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
:<s>AFCH doesn't really like multi-paragraph {{t|AFC comment}} content. It's a known issue. [[User:Primefac|Primefac]] ([[User talk:Primefac|talk]]) 00:03, 11 March 2026 (UTC)</s>
::At a wild guess, about half of my AFC comments have two or more paragraphs. Or rather, had when I posted them. Oopsie.... -- [[User:Hoary|Hoary]] ([[User talk:Hoary|talk]]) 00:35, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
:::I an sort of puzzled by the statement that AFCH doesn't like multi-paragraph AFC comments.  I frequently enter multiple templated comments on separate lines, like {{tl|perssays}} and {{tl|praise]], and I don't think I have had any problems.  Maybe the issue that Primefac refers to is more specific.  Is there a writeup that I can review?  [[User:Robert McClenon|Robert McClenon]] ([[User talk:Robert McClenon|talk]]) 16:01, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
:::What I am doing is a template within a template, which seems to work.  So I am interested in when multi-paragraph comments don't work.  [[User:Robert McClenon|Robert McClenon]] ([[User talk:Robert McClenon|talk]]) 16:04, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
:::I also often write multi-paragraph comments (mostly as add-on to decline/rejection, but sometimes stand-alone), and I can't recall ever having had a problem. Although whether any of them later got 'zapped' by the next reviewer's actions, I don't know. -- [[User:DoubleGrazing|DoubleGrazing]] ([[User talk:DoubleGrazing|talk]]) 16:44, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
::::My apologies, I was thinking of the [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Archive_57#Repeated_comments|duplicate comments bug]] that causes things to get multiplied when malformed rather than removed. [[User:Primefac|Primefac]] ([[User talk:Primefac|talk]]) 23:41, 11 March 2026 (UTC)