Editing
Talk:Exotic sphere
(section)
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Perelman or Poincare?== The article, as of just before my edit, said that the triviality of omega3 required perelman's proof of the poincare conjecture. Does it depend on the Poincare Conjecture itself (as implied by the statement at the end of the same section that the triviality <=>PC), which happened to have been proved by Perelman, or, as suggested by the pre-edit article, does the statement depend on some method or other result proved by Perelman in his mass of Ricci flow work (which is broader than PC)? I write from total ignorance, but perhaps whoever added that statement can clarify. If it really does depend on Perelman's work rather than merely depending on the bare statement of the Poincare Conj, it would be excellent to have a sentence or reference clarifying this relation. <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:David Farris|David Farris]] ([[User talk:David Farris|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/David Farris|contribs]]) 21:04, 17 October 2007 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> The previous definition of the groups theta_n was incorrect -- it was talking about cobordism classes of homotopy n-spheres. In dimension 3, all manifolds are cobordant so theta_3 is trivial by definition. The actual definition of theta_n (due to Rene Thom) is that it is h-cobordism classes of homotopy n-spheres, with the connect-sum operation as the monoid structure. 3-manifolds have an essentially unique connect-sum decomposition and there are no inverses (Kneser and Milnor proved this). So I reformulated the section: first define the monoid of exotic spheres, then define the monoid of homotopy spheres. Then mention when n>4, they are the same. Exotic spheres are homeomorphic to the standard n-sphere. Homotopy spheres are homotopy-equivalent to the standard n-sphere. I think the original author was taking the line of reasoning that if you use Perelman's result (the proof of the Poincare conjecture) then there is only one homotopy 3-sphere (the standard sphere). I doubt the previous author was referring to anything more than truth of the Poincare conjecture. [[User:Rybu|Rybu]] <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|comment]] was added at 21:27, 17 October 2007 (UTC)</small><!--Template:Undated--> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Eurovision Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Eurovision Wiki:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Navigation menu
Personal tools
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Namespaces
Page
Discussion
English
Views
Read
Edit source
Add topic
View history
More
Search
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Page information