Editing Eurovision Wiki:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement (section)

===Result concerning Faronnorth===
:''This section is to be edited only by uninvolved administrators. Comments by others will be moved to the sections above.''
* For their persistent [[WP:BATTLE|battleground conduct]], I support an indefinite topic ban of Faronnorth from the [[WP:CT/GG]] (gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them) contentious topic. As approximately half of Faronnorth's edits in article space to date ([https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3AContributions&target=Faronnorth&namespace=0&end=20260307&limit=500 43 of 87]) have been reverted, any further [[WP:DE|disruptive editing]] is likely to be met with an indefinite sitewide block. —&nbsp;'''''[[User:Newslinger|<span style="color:#536267;">Newslinger</span>]]'''&nbsp;<small>[[User talk:Newslinger#top|<span style="color:#708090;">talk</span>]]</small>'' 09:09, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
*: Faronnorth's response does not address most of the diffs in the filing, and additionally gives the impression that Faronnorth does not intend to improve their conduct. As such, I also support an indefinite sitewide block of Faronnorth, as Faronnorth is continuing to fall short of behavioral standards while maintaining a low acceptance rate for their article-space edits over an extended period of time. —&nbsp;'''''[[User:Newslinger|<span style="color:#536267;">Newslinger</span>]]'''&nbsp;<small>[[User talk:Newslinger#top|<span style="color:#708090;">talk</span>]]</small>'' 15:44, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
* We aren't in the business of removing editors for [[wrongthink]]. But we're an encyclopedia, not a reddit forum. Faronnorth's history does not inspire confidence that they are here to build an encyclopedia: I'm seeing a lot of edits, even in mainspace, that have only a tenuous relationship to what reliable sources say about their subject. I would like to hear from them, but I think a sanction is necessary, and based on edits like [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=All-women_shortlist&diff=prev&oldid=1278786514 this] (yes, that's a year ago, but only about 30 edits ago) an indef feels more appropriate than a TBAN. [[User:Vanamonde93|Vanamonde93]] ([[User talk:Vanamonde93|talk]]) 17:40, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
* Either an indef or a tban are probably needed to control the disruption --[[User:Guerillero|Guerillero]] <sup>[[User_talk:Guerillero|<span style="color: green;">Parlez Moi</span>]]</sup> 10:16, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
* The conduct is beyond battlefield editing, and goes well into violations of [[WP:CIV]] and [[WP:HAR]] (particularly [[WP:HNE]]). I would have concerns about imposing only a topic ban. The appropriate outcome is an indefinite block. [[User:Arcticocean|<span style="color:#5A4FCF">Arctic'''ocean'''&nbsp;■</span>]] 17:21, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
<!-- When closing this request use {{hat|Result}} / {{hab}}, inform the user on their talk page if they are being sanctioned (eg with {{AE sanction}} or {{uw-aeblock}} and note it in the discretionary sanctions log. -->
*<!--
-->
{{hab}}