Editing Eurovision Wiki:Closure requests (section)

== Requests for comment ==
<!--
Please place entries ordered by the date the RFC was initiated (oldest at top)

Please ensure you add the {{initiated|*date here*}} template when placing a request here

*** PLEASE don't archive old discussions yourself!  Let a bot do it. Archiving the done close requests triggers the bot to do other essential things. ***
Place new requests below this line using a level 3 heading -->

=== [[Talk:Kabyles hadra#Request for comment (RFC) on the introduction]] ===
{{initiated|10:55, 21 December 2025 (UTC)|done=yes}}
Stale RFC. Formal closure requested, please. '''[[User:AndreJustAndre|Andre]]'''<span style="border:2px solid #073642;background:rgb(255,156,0);background:linear-gradient(90deg, rgba(255,156,0,1) 0%, rgba(147,0,255,1) 45%, rgba(4,123,134,1) 87%);">[[User_talk:AndreJustAndre|🚐]]</span> 00:22, 3 March 2026 (UTC)
:Done. -- [[User:Beland|Beland]] ([[User talk:Beland|talk]]) 18:42, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

=== [[Talk:Antioch International Movement of Churches#Request for comment on anonymous former members]] ===
{{initiated|16:43, 8 January 2026 (UTC)|done=yes}}
Request for summary close of an RfC.
An RfC was held on whether criticism attributed to former members in a 2019 BuzzFeed News article should be included in the article and, if so, at what weight. Requesting an uninvolved summary close to determine the consensus outcome of the RfC. --[[User:HonestHarbor|HonestHarbor]] ([[User talk:HonestHarbor|talk]]) 22:11, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

:{{Comment|Note because I forgot to leave this earlier}}: Removed a few sentences from the original request, including a summary of the RfC, to make it more neutrally worded as to not sway closers. [[User:HurricaneZeta|<span style="background-color:#ffd98c; color:black">'''Hurricane'''</span>]][[User talk:HurricaneZeta|<span style="background-color:#ffd98c; color:black">'''Zeta'''</span>]]<sup>[[Special:Contributions/HurricaneZeta|C]]</sup> 20:10, 11 February 2026 (UTC)
:{{Done}} --[[User:Slakr|<span style="color:teal;font-weight:bold;">slakr</span>]]<small><sup>\&nbsp;[[User talk:Slakr|talk]]&nbsp;/</sup></small> 03:32, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

===[[Talk:Donald Trump#RfC: Trump's 2020 photo op at St. John's Church ]]===
{{initiated|22:14, 9 January 2026 (UTC)|done=yes}}

Request for close of Talk page discussion at [[Donald Trump]] currently titled as "RfC: Trump's 2020 photo op at St. John's Church ", which appears to have been stale since Jan 26 with no further responding editors.

This close may be offset from an overlapping 'Page split' discussion which also took place on the Talk page discussion at [[Donald Trump]] which was titled as "Merge multiple subheadings for ANI listed close request for Bulking down the article". The close for the overlapping discussion indicated an agreement among participating editors that the larger section containing the St. John's Church image should be trimmed. This may affect the closing of the current RfC listed here.

Requesting an experienced editor to do the close of this RfC which appears to have gone stale since Jan 26 when the last responding editor placed a comment. It should be noted that this RfC was listed as overlapping with a separate 'Page split' discussion which was closed (as described above) and which may influence the outcome here for this current RfC about the image for St John's Church currently in use. [[User:ErnestKrause|ErnestKrause]] ([[User talk:ErnestKrause|talk]]) 21:43, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
:{{Done}} --[[User:Slakr|<span style="color:teal;font-weight:bold;">slakr</span>]]<small><sup>\&nbsp;[[User talk:Slakr|talk]]&nbsp;/</sup></small> 04:49, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

=== [[Talk:Nick Shirley#RfC: Political descriptor]] ===
{{Initiated|01:58, 15 January 2026 (UTC)}}
Can an uninvolved admin please close this RfC? Thanks. [[User:Some1|Some1]] ([[User talk:Some1|talk]]) 00:25, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

===[[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Australian politics#Removing minor parties and independents from election infobox]]===
{{Initiated|12:40, 15 January 2026 (UTC)}} Discussion appears stale with last comment being over 10 days ago as of writing this request. I assume enough responses are present for a consensus. [[User:Qwerty123M|Qwerty123M]] ([[User talk:Qwerty123M|talk]]) 02:59, 5 March 2026 (UTC)
:{{ping|Qwerty123M}} I see plenty of discussion but not much where the actual RfC is concerned. Some votes exist in what is nominally the pre-RfC discussion. Can you clarify the situation? [[User:Iseult|<span style="color: #35b794">'''I'''seult</span>]]<span style="color: #3558b7;"><sup>[[Special:Contribs/Iseult|'' Δx '']]</sup>[[User talk:Iseult|talk to me]]</span> 22:23, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

=== [[Wikipedia:Village pump (miscellaneous)/Archive 87#RFC: Baltic bios infoboxes question]]===
{{Initiated|18:33, 15 January 2026 (UTC)}} RFC template has expired, after a month. [[User:GoodDay|GoodDay]] ([[User talk:GoodDay|talk]]) 23:30, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

=== [[Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)/RfC LLMCOMM guideline]] ===
{{initiated|19:37, 15 January 2026 (UTC)}}
Stagnant for 2 days now, after I think plenty enough discussion to determine a consensus. [[User:Athanelar|Athanelar]] ([[User talk:Athanelar|talk]]) 15:14, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

=== [[Talk:2020s Minnesota fraud scandals#RFC - Lead]] ===
{{Initiated|05:47, 17 January 2026 (UTC)}}
Can an uninvolved admin please close this RfC? Please and thank you. [[User:Some1|Some1]] ([[User talk:Some1|talk]]) 00:23, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

:Seconding this request. Thank you! —[[User:Ganesha811|Ganesha811]] ([[User talk:Ganesha811|talk]]) 12:25, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

=== [[Talk:Syria#Kurdish on the Infobox (RfC)]] ===
{{initiated|01:55, 18 January 2026 (UTC)|done=yes}}
The RFC tag has been removed, and the discussion is already inconclusive and ready to be closed.  <span style="font-family: Georgia; background-color: maroon; padding: 2px 3px 1px 3px;">[[User:HurricaneEdgar|<span style="color: greenyellow">HurricaneEdgar</span>]] [[HurricaneEdgar|<span style="color: greenyellow"></span>]]</span> 11:50, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
:{{close}}, {{u|HurricaneEdgar}}. [[User:Iseult|<span style="color: #35b794">'''I'''seult</span>]]<span style="color: #3558b7;"><sup>[[Special:Contribs/Iseult|'' Δx '']]</sup>[[User talk:Iseult|talk to me]]</span> 22:39, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

=== [[Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Airport destination lists - sourcing requirements]] ===
{{Initiated|10:59, 19 January 2026 (UTC)}} RFC is about to expire and has largely died down, with the newest comment made about a week ago. [[User:S5A-0043|<span style="font-weight: bold; background-color: #00A2E8; color: #ffffff;">S5A-0043🚎</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:S5A-0043|(Talk)]]</sup> 04:01, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

=== [[Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Merging merge discussions with AfD]] ===
{{initiated|18:24, 19 January 2026 (UTC)}} Natural causes. <small>Totally not of [[#Merger proposals]].</small> [[User:Aaron Liu|<span class="skin-invert" style="color:#0645ad">Aaron Liu</span>]] ([[User talk:Aaron Liu#top|talk]]) 23:01, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

===[[Talk:Sanctioned Suicide#RfC on the inclusion of an external link to the website]]===
{{Initiated|01:20, 1 February 2026 (UTC)}}
The date above is from the second time the RfC template was added, the first time was in [[Special:Diff/1293026549|May 2025]]. In any case, new comments have stopped coming and this RfC is in need of closure. [[User:Warudo|Warudo]] ([[User talk:Warudo|talk]]) 11:34, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

=== [[Talk:Moroccanoil#RfC about the national allegiance of a multinational business]] ===
{{Initiated|03:58, 3 February 2026 (UTC)|done=yes}}

I became aware of this discussion due to a Feedback Request Service notification on my talk page. The discussion relates to the nationality of the company in the first sentence and a paragraph on alleged cultural appropriation in the controversy section. From what I could tell, the consensus was fairly clear with a single editor disagreeing with three other participants. I stated my position as a (then) neutral party agreeing with the majority and attempted to implement what I saw as the general consensus. This has since been undone by the same single editor who accused me of disruption by implementing the talk page consensus, so I am bringing it here for a more formal close. [[User:Avgeekamfot|Avgeekamfot]] ([[User talk:Avgeekamfot|talk]]) 16:28, 19 February 2026 (UTC)
{{collapse top|This noticeboard is for requesting closures of discussions, not for re-litigating the discussion. Requests should remain neutral and not invite such discussion as well. [[User:CommunityNotesContributor|CNC]] ([[User talk:CommunityNotesContributor|talk]]) 10:51, 22 February 2026 (UTC)}}
:I came here to open a request but it has already been done. I’m the allegedly bad guy involved in the discussion. The whole thing has been flawed since the beginning, with two very different issues being mixed together. The request needs to be procedurally closed ASAP and the users invited to start from scratch by bringing substantiated evidence that my additions/edits are misleading or out of place, rather than just claiming things they cannot prove and mixing a question regarding a company’s national affiliation with one about the controversies surrounding it. ~ [[User:IvanScrooge98|'''<span style="color:#0096FF">Ivan</span><span style="color:#FFAC1C">Scrooge</span><span style="color:#0096FF">98</span>''']] ([[user talk:IvanScrooge98|<span style="color:grey">talk</span>]]) 23:23, 20 February 2026 (UTC)
:Oh also, the request for comment was started by {{diff|Moroccanoil|1333136988|prev|a vandal}} and none of the users who intervened – except me – even remotely noticed how suspicious that behavior could be. Another great reason to nullify this trial against me. ~ [[User:IvanScrooge98|'''<span style="color:#0096FF">Ivan</span><span style="color:#FFAC1C">Scrooge</span><span style="color:#0096FF">98</span>''']] ([[user talk:IvanScrooge98|<span style="color:grey">talk</span>]]) 23:27, 20 February 2026 (UTC)
:Yet another user chimed in to add {{diff|Talk:Moroccanoil|1339695106|1339693094|unsubstantiated biased accusations}}. Will someone kindly intervene to stop this circus? ~ [[User:IvanScrooge98|'''<span style="color:#0096FF">Ivan</span><span style="color:#FFAC1C">Scrooge</span><span style="color:#0096FF">98</span>''']] ([[user talk:IvanScrooge98|<span style="color:grey">talk</span>]]) 22:15, 21 February 2026 (UTC)
::This user has serious [[WP:CIVIL]] issues [[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AMoroccanoil&diff=1339698383&oldid=1339697345|issues]] and likes to accuse anyone who doesn't agree with him of being part of a conspiracy or 'team up' against him. Also seems way too invested in the topic. [[User:Guile&#39;s Theme|Guile&#39;s Theme]] ([[User talk:Guile&#39;s Theme|talk]]) 22:46, 21 February 2026 (UTC)
:::The way I reacted to that ridiculous discussion shouldn’t matter since this whole request was started in a twisted, non-neutral way by a disruptive user. That conversation says more about those who aligned with the vandal than it does about me. Regards. ~ [[User:IvanScrooge98|'''<span style="color:#0096FF">Ivan</span><span style="color:#FFAC1C">Scrooge</span><span style="color:#0096FF">98</span>''']] ([[user talk:IvanScrooge98|<span style="color:grey">talk</span>]]) 22:48, 21 February 2026 (UTC)
:IvanScrooge98 has made 111 edits to this page, beginning 11 days after it was created in 2024. He has reverted the work of at least three other editors on these two issues. [[User:Julian in LA|Julian in LA]] ([[User talk:Julian in LA|talk]]) 01:38, 22 February 2026 (UTC)
::And yet IvanScrooge98 has built the article based on evidence and sources. Julian in LA came to vandalize it and destroy it, sadly with the help of other editors. All I want to say is it’s pretty clear who is trying to contribute and who isn’t. ~ [[User:IvanScrooge98|'''<span style="color:#0096FF">Ivan</span><span style="color:#FFAC1C">Scrooge</span><span style="color:#0096FF">98</span>''']] ([[user talk:IvanScrooge98|<span style="color:grey">talk</span>]]) 02:41, 22 February 2026 (UTC)
:::No evidence has been provided and the sources given do not reflect a wider public discourse or reporting of the supposed controversies around this company that he wishes to include in the article violating due weight policy. The term 'cultural appropriation' is also not actually used in the sources cited in that part of the article. Ivan has been very quick to accuse anyone who doesn't agree with him of 'bad faith' yet ironically on his user page prominently features things such as "This user has visited Palestine", "This user participates in WikiProject Palestine", "This user has publicly declared that he has a conflict of interest regarding the Wikipedia article Souzan Fatayer." (a Palestinian-Italian figure known almost entirely for Palestinian-Israeli conflict related political activism), and "The Peace Barnstar For contributing to Global Sumud Flotilla and submitting the Freedom Flotilla Coalition". Having your opinions and biases is fine but if you are going to so quickly accuse everyone who doesn't agree with you of being the ones biased and operating on bad faith maybe you should work on topics that don't overlap with your personal politics so much or personal conflicts of interest given your already declared one with Souzan Fatayer.
:::It should probably also be noted that even though [[WP:COIEDIT]] says "you are strongly discouraged from editing affected articles directly" when you have a conflict of interest Ivan has made 88.4% of the total edits and written 99.1% of the text in the Souzan Fatayer article... 
:::https://xtools.wmcloud.org/articleinfo/en.wikipedia.org/Souzan_Fatayer [[User:Guile&#39;s Theme|Guile&#39;s Theme]] ([[User talk:Guile&#39;s Theme|talk]]) 02:47, 22 February 2026 (UTC)
::::And yet my contributions to all of these articles have been extremely meaningful, while you still haven’t uttered a single word about Julian in LA, the user who opened the witch trial against me that you’re upholding and at the same time the vandal who deliberately changed “Israeli” to “Andromedan” and “Jovian” multiple times out of spite, purely for vandalic purposes. Keep making a fool of yourself. ~ [[User:IvanScrooge98|'''<span style="color:#0096FF">Ivan</span><span style="color:#FFAC1C">Scrooge</span><span style="color:#0096FF">98</span>''']] ([[user talk:IvanScrooge98|<span style="color:grey">talk</span>]]) 10:32, 22 February 2026 (UTC)
{{collapse bottom}}
The last comment was February 22. Can this be closed now? Who should modify the article based on the established consensus? [[User:Julian in LA|Julian in LA]] ([[User talk:Julian in LA|talk]]) 01:38, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
:{{Done}} - [[User:Nemov|Nemov]] ([[User talk:Nemov|talk]]) 16:59, 18 March 2026 (UTC)
::Thank you, @[[User:Nemov|Nemov]]! [[User:Avgeekamfot|Avgeekamfot]] ([[User talk:Avgeekamfot|talk]]) 18:04, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

=== [[Talk:Killing of Alex Pretti#RfC on mentioning Pretti's previous confrontation with ICE in "Background " section]] ===
{{Initiated|05:41, 3 February 2026 (UTC)|done=yes}} Discussion has died down, with one new !vote and no additions to #Discussion in the last week [[User:Placeholderer|Placeholderer]] ([[User talk:Placeholderer|talk]]) 22:45, 18 February 2026 (UTC)

=== [[Wikipedia talk:Non-free content#RfC: cast photos of reality TV shows]] ===
{{Initiated|20:42, 3 February 2026 (UTC)}} I know I'm requesting this probably very early, but participation at this minute has been very low lately, i.e. discussion has died down tremendous. I don't expect huge increase of participations by then. --[[User:George Ho|George Ho]] ([[User talk:George Ho|talk]]) 10:00, 12 February 2026 (UTC)

Honestly, I don't mind two or more uninvolved closers for collaborative closure, especially if the closure would be too hard for a single person to make an effective determination and evaluation. Nonetheless, hopefully, one or two is an enough amount. --[[User:George Ho|George Ho]] ([[User talk:George Ho|talk]]) 06:01, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

=== [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard#RfC: The Points Guy (TPG)]] ===
{{initiated|17:51, 4 February 2026 (UTC)|done=no}} Discussion has died down and RFC tag removed, ready to be closed. -- <small>LCU</small> '''[[User:ActivelyDisinterested|A<small>ctively</small>D<small>isinterested</small>]]''' <small>''«[[User talk:ActivelyDisinterested|@]]» °[[Special:Contributions/ActivelyDisinterested|∆t]]°''</small> 20:58, 11 March 2026 (UTC)

=== [[Talk:North Africa#Request for Comment - Inclusion of Content Ethnic Groups Section]] ===
{{Initiated|20:32, 5 February 2026 (UTC)}} 
Strong support for the proposition with a minority opposition. There has been no further voting/views expressed since the 12th February. Would appreciate an administrator closing the RfC decisively now as it passed the natural 30 day limit and no further views seem to be incoming.[[User:WikiUser4020|WikiUser4020]] ([[User talk:WikiUser4020|talk]]) 08:19, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

=== [[Talk:Opinion polling for the 2026 Israeli legislative election#c-Braganza-20260206145500-RfC]]===
{{Initiated|14:55, 6 February 2026 (UTC)|type=rfc|done=}} this discussion essentially concerns how a table displaying polling data should be laid out, particularly how parties should be grouped, if at all. 
Template has not yet expired, but discussion seems to have died down. I personally think it has gone on long enough, and it would be useful if an outsider could help us move forward. [[User:Slomo666|Slomo666]] ([[User talk:Slomo666|talk]]) 21:58, 3 March 2026 (UTC)

=== [[Talk:Joseph_Stalin#RFC:_Lead_image_(again)]] ===
{{initiated|04:18, 18 February 2026 (UTC)|done=yes}} This topic keeps coming up, so a strong close is needed to settle it for awhile. Thanks! [[User:Nemov|Nemov]] ([[User talk:Nemov|talk]]) 16:08, 18 March 2026 (UTC) 

:{{done}} <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS;">[[User:Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: DarkGreen">md</span>]][[User talk:Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: Indigo">m.b</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: Maroon">la</span>]]</span> 03:40, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

=== [[Talk:Zara_Larsson#RfC:_Which_image_to_use_as_main?]] ===
{{initiated|02:54, 23 February 2026 (UTC)|done=no}}
119 comments, 39 people in discussion. Seems like all arguments have been made at least once now, and comments have died off. Note that this issue has had some media coverage, see "This article has been mentioned by multiple media organizations:" template at top of talkpage. [[User:Gråbergs Gråa Sång|Gråbergs Gråa Sång]] ([[User talk:Gråbergs Gråa Sång|talk]]) 12:30, 18 March 2026 (UTC)


=== Place new discussions concerning RfCs above this line using a level 3 heading ===
{{User:ClueBot III/DoNotArchiveUntil|2147483647}}

<!-- Place this line below the heading:
{{Initiated|<date and time when RfC was opened, in the format as would be produced by ~~~~~>}}
If the discussion is not an RfC (which is the default), add a |type=xxx code for the discussion type, e.g. |type=drv for deletion review; see Template:Initiated/doc for a list of codes.

-->