Editing Eurovision Wiki talk:WikiProject Articles for creation (section)

=== nosource ===
Why did we add "nosource"? Isn't it the same thing as "v"? I'd recommend removing "nosource", to reduce duplication. –[[User:Novem Linguae|<span style="color:blue">'''Novem Linguae'''</span>]] <small>([[User talk:Novem Linguae|talk]])</small> 17:20, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
:Agreed. If I had to guess it's the difference between "inadequately sourced" and "not sourced", which is a distinction without any real difference. [[User:Primefac|Primefac]] ([[User talk:Primefac|talk]]) 21:16, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
:I was [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation#c-Nil_NZ-20260128084100-David10244-20260128081600 personally against it], as our notability decline templates already states {{tq|The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that...}}, but was in the minority. I think merging "v" and "nosource" could be a good option? [[User:Nil NZ|<span style="color:#000;font-family:Comic Sans MS;border-radius:20px;background-color:#8ACE00;padding:4px 7px 5px 7px">nil</span>]]<sup> [[User talk:Nil NZ|<span style="color:#000">nz</span>]]</sup> 21:42, 16 March 2026 (UTC)