Editing Talk:Co-counselling (section)

==Censorship==
There seems to be a concerted effort to censor any mention of  co-counselling outside of  Re-evaluation counselling by the following unregistered users. 

{{user|86.135.33.229}}, {{user|81.159.172.242}} uk, {{user|81.159.168.31}} uk, {{user|86.135.32.135}}

The same paragraphs are being repeatedly removed by what look like different people.  I have created seperate pages for RC and CCI . The main Co-counselling  page must describe both approaches plus any other uses of the term.  [[User:Lumos3|Lumos3]] 12:35, 10 October 2005 (UTC)

:I think the word "censorship" is being used here to describe someone who doesn't agree with the views expressed on the "main co-counselling page", which are actually quite subjective and do not accurately describe either the history of co-counselling or it's subsequent development. This page is typical of the problems with Wikipedia in that a particular interest group or viewpoint is taken to be the dominant one provided they get there first. <small>&mdash;''The preceding [[Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages|unsigned]] comment was added by'' [[User:81.159.45.25|81.159.45.25]] ([[User talk:81.159.45.25|talk]]&nbsp;&bull;&nbsp;[[Special:Contributions/81.159.45.25|contribs]]) 16:40, 23 January 2006 UTC.</small><!--Inserted with Template:Unsigned-->

Please take an active role in getting the article to a more NPOV form if that is what you think is needed. [[User:Lumos3|Lumos3]] 11:20, 25 January 2006 (UTC)

:I think what we're seeing here is that a neutral viewpoint to CCI people means rubbishing RC. To RC'ers it means virtually a statement of faith that RC (and Harvey Jackins) created co-counselling and this view is apparently not acceptable to CCI'ers. Against that background I doubt if it is possible to have an NPOV "co-counselling" page. Perhaps each side should just give up and have their own separate pages and agree not to alter each other's? Sarah Williams.  <small>&mdash;''The preceding [[Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages|unsigned]] comment was added by'' [[User:SarahWilliams|SarahWilliams]] ([[User talk:SarahWilliams|talk]]&nbsp;&bull;&nbsp;[[Special:Contributions/SarahWilliams|contribs]]) 22:42, 25 January 2006.</small><!--Inserted with Template:Unsigned-->

::Probably CCI'ers would then start attacking HJ and TJ on their pages, notice this is already happening on the TJ page. Surprised his lawyers don't activate, as their are already false claims on that bit! (Mark, Seattle, USA)  <small>&mdash;''The preceding [[Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages|unsigned]] comment was added by'' [[User:SarahWilliams|SarahWilliams]] ([[User talk:SarahWilliams|talk]]&nbsp;&bull;&nbsp;[[Special:Contributions/SarahWilliams|contribs]]) 22:42, 25 January 2006.</small><!--Inserted with Template:Unsigned--> <small>''Note: this post was made in the same unitary edit as the preceding Sarah Williams one, despite having a putative different name and country of residence. It throws into doubt the posts attributed to "An RC'er in England" and "Derek Davies" and the anonymous ones, above.''</small>