Editing Eurovision Wiki:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk (section)

= March 18 =

== Request for second review — Draft:Presolv360 ==

My draft [[Draft:Presolv360]] has been declined three times by the same reviewer with identical template feedback. I have rewritten the draft significantly each time per WP:NPOV, WP:YFA, and WP:RS guidance. I am a disclosed paid editor per WP:PAID on [[User:Legalwiki123]]. I would appreciate a second reviewer looking at the current draft and pointing to specific sentences that remain promotional, as the same generic feedback has been given three times without specific examples. [[User:Legalwiki123|Legalwiki123]] ([[User talk:Legalwiki123|talk]]) 04:52, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

:There have been two reviewers, not the same one all three times. Did you actually read the links in the feedback you have been given?
:It is evident that this wasn't written by you, but by an AI, given the name dropping of sources and formatting features. That isn't permitted; see [[WP:NEWLLM]]. The draft also cites ''Times of India'' multiple times, which isn't considered a trusted source on Wikipedia; see [[WP:TIMESOFINDIA]].
:The publicity purpose is evident from going into unnecessary detail about [[WP:CORPROUTINE]] business activities, and unduly emphasizing services and founders.
:Finally, as a paid editor, you are being paid to learn the rules here without help from unpaid volunteers, whose donated time is far more valuable than yours. ~[[User:Anachronist|Anachronist]] (who / me) <small>([[User talk:Anachronist|talk]])</small> 05:35, 18 March 2026 (UTC)
:Hello, @[[User:Legalwiki123|Legalwiki123]]
:Would you expect to take on a new task in your work without first getting the requisite training? (Writing for Wikipedia is very different from any other kind of writing that I've encountered). 
:My earnest advice to new editors is to not even ''think'' about  trying to create an article until you have spent several weeks - at least - learning about how Wikipedia works by making improvements to existing articles. Once you have understood core policies such as [[WP:verifiability|verifiability]], [[WP:neutral point of view|neutral point of view]], [[WP:42|reliable, independent sources]], and [[WP:notability|notability]], and experienced how we handle disagreements with other editors (the [[WP:BRD|Bold, Revert, Discuss]] cycle), then you might be ready to read [[WP:your first article|your first article]] carefully, and try creating a draft. If you don't follow this advice but try to create an article without this preparation, you are likely to have a frustrating and disappointing experience with Wikipedia. [[User:ColinFine|ColinFine]] ([[User talk:ColinFine|talk]]) 12:08, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

== 05:07, 18 March 2026 review of submission by Anchlrbh ==
{{Lafc|username=Anchlrbh|ts=05:07, 18 March 2026|draft=Draft:Abhishek_Bhardwaj}}
Hey, Can you tell me why you rejected this? This person is working in theatres from last 8, 9 years and have done many advertisements for Fair & Gold cream,Road safety with Amitabh Bachchan,Many ads for mobile phones with Farhan Akhtar,in 2024 he was in Apne Ram documentry by Priydarshan. Now Worked in Bhoot Bangla in Upcoming bollywood big film. I have references in 50+ newspapers. So now where is the mistake? [[User:Anchlrbh|Anchlrbh]] ([[User talk:Anchlrbh|talk]]) 05:07, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

:The draft failed to demonstrate notability as defined in [[WP:NACTOR]]. If you can make a strong case for notability, you may appeal to the reviewer who rejected the draft to re-open it for improvement and resubmission. Right now you cite only two sources, and in a biography of a living person, every assertion you make about the person needs to be verifiable by a reliable source. ~[[User:Anachronist|Anachronist]] (who / me) <small>([[User talk:Anachronist|talk]])</small> 05:22, 18 March 2026 (UTC)
::Ok So, please revive this draft. I will add more references [[User:Anchlrbh|Anchlrbh]] ([[User talk:Anchlrbh|talk]]) 05:25, 18 March 2026 (UTC)
:::Please pay attention to what I wrote. I am not the reviewer who rejected it. ~[[User:Anachronist|Anachronist]] (who / me) <small>([[User talk:Anachronist|talk]])</small> 05:26, 18 March 2026 (UTC)
::::Then why you are texting for this? I think You rejected this. [[User:Anchlrbh|Anchlrbh]] ([[User talk:Anchlrbh|talk]]) 05:34, 18 March 2026 (UTC)
:::::You asked a question on a help page. I and many other people monitor this page and answer questions. That's why. If you want to ask the reviewer a question, then use the reviewer's talk page.
:::::Can you not read the reviewer's name in the rejection notice? {{U|Theroadislong}} rejected it. ~[[User:Anachronist|Anachronist]] (who / me) <small>([[User talk:Anachronist|talk]])</small> 05:52, 18 March 2026 (UTC)
::::::I have removed my rejection, please add more sources, read [[WP:REFB]] and re-submit when you think they pass the criteria ay [[WP:NACTOR]]. [[User:Theroadislong|Theroadislong]] ([[User talk:Theroadislong|talk]]) 07:41, 18 March 2026 (UTC)
:::::{{u|Ahnchlrbh}} This help desk is monitored by many people, not just the reviewer of your draft.  If you intended to communicate with just them, you should do that on their personal user talk page. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 08:11, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

== 05:20, 18 March 2026 review of submission by Mouadh.jaber ==
{{Lafc|username=Mouadh.jaber|ts=05:20, 18 March 2026|draft=Draft:Mouadh_Jaber}}
Could you advise me what how to publish biography  [[User:Mouadh.jaber|Mouadh.jaber]] ([[User talk:Mouadh.jaber|talk]]) 05:20, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

:This is a [[resume]], not a biographical encyclopedic article. May I suggest you publish it on [https://www.linkedin.com/ LinkedIn] instead. [[User:Nil NZ|<span style="color:#000;font-family:Comic Sans MS;border-radius:20px;background-color:#8ACE00;padding:4px 7px 5px 7px">nil</span>]]<sup> [[User talk:Nil NZ|<span style="color:#000">nz</span>]]</sup> 05:23, 18 March 2026 (UTC)
:You can't publish it. It was '''rejected''', which means it will not be considered further. And, it has been deleted because its existence was purely for publicity purposes, which is prohibited on Wikipedia.
:Please answer: Exactly ''why'' do you want an article about yourself? Vanity? Publicity? Search engine optimization? Job search? None of those are valid reasons.
:If you are truly notable, someone will eventually come along and write an article about you. Whether that happens next week, 5 years from now, or after you are dead, shouldn't matter to you in the least. ~[[User:Anachronist|Anachronist]] (who / me) <small>([[User talk:Anachronist|talk]])</small> 05:25, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

== 08:23, 18 March 2026 review of submission by Lots3000 ==
{{Lafc|username=Lots3000|ts=08:23, 18 March 2026|draft=Draft:Mats Haugen}}
Hi, I have submitted a draft about a Norwegian musician (member of Circus Maximus) with multiple sources (NRK, LouderSound). I would appreciate a review when possible. Thank you! [[User:Lots3000|Lots3000]] ([[User talk:Lots3000|talk]]) 08:23, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

:You have already submitted it for a review, so it will be reviewed at some point; there's no need for a separate request for a review. I would advise you to continue improving it while it's in the queue as I think it's very unlikely to be accepted in its current state. The vast majority of the sources are interviews, which can't establish notability, the few independent sources are reviews talk very little about Mats Haugen directly, and there's poor direct sourcing of much of the prose in the article. [[User:CoffeeCrumbs|CoffeeCrumbs]] ([[User talk:CoffeeCrumbs|talk]]) 08:39, 18 March 2026 (UTC)
:Hello, @[[User:Lots3000|Lots3000]]. 
:A Wikipedia article should be a [[WP:Neutral point of view|neutral summary]] of what the [[WP:DUEWEIGHT|majority of people]] who are [[WP:Independent sources|wholly unconnected]] with the subject have independently chosen to publish about the subject in [[WP:Reliable sources|reliable publications]], (see [[WP:Golden rule|Golden rule]]) and not much else. [[WP:No original research|What you know]] (or anybody else knows) about the subject is not relevant except where it can be [[WP:Verifiability|verified]] from a reliable published source. [[User:ColinFine|ColinFine]] ([[User talk:ColinFine|talk]]) 12:20, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

== 08:57, 18 March 2026 review of submission by ~2026-16958-57 ==
{{Lafc|username=~2026-16958-57|ts=08:57, 18 March 2026|draft=Draft:Beck_Martin}}
I am requesting assistance with my draft article, Draft:Beck_Martin. I would appreciate feedback on whether the topic meets Wikipedia’s notability guidelines and advice on improving the article’s structure, sourcing, and overall quality. If there are any specific issues preventing the draft from being accepted, I would be grateful for guidance on how to address them. [[Special:Contributions/&#126;2026-16958-57|&#126;2026-16958-57]] ([[User talk:&#126;2026-16958-57|talk]]) 08:57, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

:Firstly @[[User:~2026-16958-57|~2026-16958-57]] - it's best not to use LLM, including when liaising with other editors. Secondly at the time I rejected it, and despite multiple previous declines, the YouTube and Amazon source were once again presented in the draft, which made me feel you were not taking previous review advice into consideration. They have now gone, which is good, and what you need to do now is look very carefully at [[WP:MUSICBIO]] and check that the notability criteria works for the subject AND that you have really solid sourcing for it. This list is for music albums but you may find it helpful in this context: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Albums/Sources]]. If you are the subject then you need to declare it on your talk page (you have probably logged out of your account here), but it's then hard/impossible/strongly discouraged to do, see [[WP:FAQAS]]. But first of all, read the advice already given on your draft to understand the previous draft's problems. It's not easy doing article. [[User:ChrysGalley|ChrysGalley]] ([[User talk:ChrysGalley|talk]]) 11:48, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

== 09:07, 18 March 2026 review of submission by DineshKumarDelhi ==
{{Lafc|username=DineshKumarDelhi|ts=09:07, 18 March 2026|draft=Draft:Surya_Sonal_Singh}}
"I am a new editor and I need guidance on the rejection of [[Draft:Surya Sonal Singh]]. I have addressed the previous concerns regarding AI-style phrasing by manually rewriting the entire text in simple language. Additionally, I have now included a significant, independent secondary source from News24 (a major national news outlet in India), which provides in-depth coverage of the subject's environmental activism and 'Surya Model' of digital outreach. I would like to know if this new evidence meets the WP:NPOL or WP:BIO criteria, or if further specific improvements are required." [[User:DineshKumarDelhi|dinesh kumar]] ([[User talk:DineshKumarDelhi|talk]]) 09:07, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

:He does not meet [[WP:NPOLITICIAN]] as he does not hold elective office or has not won election to elective office. You wrote that "Singh is known for his work in environment and wildlife protection in the Palamu area" but there is very little indication of this in the draft; you mention a film and a speech but give no indication that those things were particularly influential in public policy or led to widespread public awareness cited to him personally.  I agree it's the end of the line for this draft, sorry. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 09:14, 18 March 2026 (UTC)
:Vapid phrases like "received attention in the media" clearly indicates that the AI slop hasn't been cleaned up. The draft has been rejected, so it won't be considered further. ~[[User:Anachronist|Anachronist]] (who / me) <small>([[User talk:Anachronist|talk]])</small> 00:16, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

== 11:54, 18 March 2026 review of submission by Creative ssr ==
{{Lafc|username=Creative ssr|ts=11:54, 18 March 2026|draft=Draft:Sher_Singh_(novelist)}}
Hello,

I have created a draft article about an Indian author, but it has been declined three times due to concerns about notability and reliable sources.

I have added references from newspapers such as Dainik Bhaskar and Rajasthan Patrika, along with some other media coverage. However, I understand that the current sources may not be considered sufficient.

Could you please guide me on:

1. What type of sources would be considered strong enough for notability in this case?
2. Whether regional newspaper coverage is sufficient, or if national-level sources are required?
3. How I can improve the draft to meet Wikipedia’s guidelines for biographies?

Thank you for your time and guidance.
 [[User:Creative ssr|Creative ssr]] ([[User talk:Creative ssr|talk]]) 11:54, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

:Hello, @[[User:Creative ssr|Creative ssr]]. 
:Please see [[WP:golden rule|golden rule]] for information about the kinds of sources that are required. 
:Your user name suggests that you may be professionally involved in PR: if this is the case, please note that [[WP:paid editors|paid editors]] '''must''' make a formal declaration of that status. 
:My earnest advice to new editors is to not even ''think'' about  trying to create an article until you have spent several weeks - at least - learning about how Wikipedia works by making improvements to existing articles. Once you have understood core policies such as [[WP:verifiability|verifiability]], [[WP:neutral point of view|neutral point of view]], [[WP:42|reliable, independent sources]], and [[WP:notability|notability]], and experienced how we handle disagreements with other editors (the [[WP:BRD|Bold, Revert, Discuss]] cycle), then you might be ready to read [[WP:your first article|your first article]] carefully, and try creating a draft. If you don't follow this advice but try to create an article without this preparation, you are likely to have a frustrating and disappointing experience with Wikipedia. [[User:ColinFine|ColinFine]] ([[User talk:ColinFine|talk]]) 12:23, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

== 12:33, 18 March 2026 review of submission by ~2026-17235-55 ==
{{Lafc|username=~2026-17235-55|ts=12:33, 18 March 2026|draft=}}
I have no idea why there’s an issue with this article, first it was removed because there isn’t enough sources but then after adding more it was removed again. What is wrong with it? It’s a blockbuster film that is going to be released in a couple days and already has the trailer out. [[Special:Contributions/&#126;2026-17235-55|&#126;2026-17235-55]] ([[User talk:&#126;2026-17235-55|talk]]) 12:33, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

:I think you edited while logged out, and you did not provide the title of the draft. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 12:40, 18 March 2026 (UTC)
:Hello, @[[User:~2026-17235-55|~2026-17235-55]].
:Has there been reliable, independent material published, going into detail about the film? If not, then it is probably [[WP:TOOSOON]]. (Note that neither brief mentions, nor articles based on press-releases or interviews, will count towards that). [[User:ColinFine|ColinFine]] ([[User talk:ColinFine|talk]]) 14:25, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

== 14:07, 18 March 2026 review of submission by Editormed4445354 ==
{{Lafc|username=Editormed4445354|ts=14:07, 18 March 2026|draft=Draft:Mourad_Karami}}
Hello i just want some advice or an editor to edit my draft because i have over 9 media coverage in it but it still declined thank you [[User:Editormed4445354|Editormed4445354]] ([[User talk:Editormed4445354|talk]]) 14:07, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

:Your article has been rejected, and will not be considered for inclusion unless you can convince the rejecting reviewer to overturn that decision. [[User:Athanelar|Athanelar]] ([[User talk:Athanelar|talk]]) 22:51, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

== 14:08, 18 March 2026 review of submission by ~2026-17102-59 ==
{{Lafc|username=~2026-17102-59|ts=14:08, 18 March 2026|draft=Draft:Heather_Chirtea}}
Can you identify which sources are not considered valid or significant? 
Can you tell me which sections or phrases to rewrite?
What copyright issues are violated? I've cited public sources. 
Thank you [[Special:Contributions/&#126;2026-17102-59|&#126;2026-17102-59]] ([[User talk:&#126;2026-17102-59|talk]]) 14:08, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

:I'm not seeing how she's notable; she owns a particular vehicle and goes around the country promoting it. That might be relevant to the vehicle itself([[Pivotal BlackFly]]) and could be used to expand that article instead. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 15:20, 18 March 2026 (UTC)
:I don't see copyright issues being flagged. The possibility of copyright issues is just part of the description of some of the issues related to LLM usage.
:In this case, the article was clearly written by an LLM. It's the same formal-but-stilted style, with some of the favorite go-to phrases of LLMs, and the strange tendency of LLMs futilely making a Wikipedia article to, rather than describe the coverage in sources, talk about the existence of sources saying something. The whole article is problematic; I'm not taking a position on whether this individual is notable, but this article would need to be [[WP:TNT]]'ed and written properly without the use of LLMs to be taken into consideration. [[User:CoffeeCrumbs|CoffeeCrumbs]] ([[User talk:CoffeeCrumbs|talk]]) 15:23, 18 March 2026 (UTC)
::It's been TNT'd.  Now we'll see if it can be created properly the second time around. ~[[User:Anachronist|Anachronist]] (who / me) <small>([[User talk:Anachronist|talk]])</small> 00:14, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

== 14:53, 18 March 2026 review of submission by ~2026-17024-10 ==
{{Lafc|username=~2026-17024-10|ts=14:53, 18 March 2026|draft=Draft:Sam_Lewis}}
how can i get this published it got labeled LLM generated. i put it in one to format [[Special:Contributions/&#126;2026-17024-10|&#126;2026-17024-10]] ([[User talk:&#126;2026-17024-10|talk]]) 14:53, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

:I can see that LLM was used in an acceptable way, however the article would still be unacceptable as the sourcing does not indicate they meet the criteria of [[WP:GNG]] or [[WP:MUSICBIO]]. The Opry profile and his own site have zero value as they are not independent, nor are tour listings or interviews. We need to see published stories about him from people not connected to him. [[User:Mcmatter|McMatter]] <sup>([[User talk:Mcmatter|talk]])</sup>/<sub>([[Special:Contributions/Mcmatter|contrib]])</sub> 15:01, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

== 15:56, 18 March 2026 review of submission by Music Article Creator ==
{{Lafc|username=Music Article Creator|ts=15:56, 18 March 2026|draft=Draft:T. S. Nandakumar}}
Hi, 

I have submitted a draft on T. S. Nandakumar (Carnatic percussionist). The draft includes coverage from Sruti Magazine, The Times of India, Bhavan’s Journal, and other independent sources. I would appreciate a review when possible. 

Thank you. [[User:Music Article Creator|Music Article Creator]] ([[User talk:Music Article Creator|talk]]) 15:56, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

:It's not necessary to submit and then ask for a review; your draft is submitted and pending. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 17:06, 18 March 2026 (UTC)
:Declined as evidently AI generated. Rewrite from scratch as a [[WP:SUMMARY|summary]] of the information in your sources. [[User:Athanelar|Athanelar]] ([[User talk:Athanelar|talk]]) 22:08, 18 March 2026 (UTC)
:Times of India is not considered a trustworthy source. LLM chatbots seem to love citing it, however. ~[[User:Anachronist|Anachronist]] (who / me) <small>([[User talk:Anachronist|talk]])</small> 23:19, 18 March 2026 (UTC)