Editing Eurovision Wiki:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk (section)

== 08:23, 18 March 2026 review of submission by Lots3000 ==
{{Lafc|username=Lots3000|ts=08:23, 18 March 2026|draft=Draft:Mats Haugen}}
Hi, I have submitted a draft about a Norwegian musician (member of Circus Maximus) with multiple sources (NRK, LouderSound). I would appreciate a review when possible. Thank you! [[User:Lots3000|Lots3000]] ([[User talk:Lots3000|talk]]) 08:23, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

:You have already submitted it for a review, so it will be reviewed at some point; there's no need for a separate request for a review. I would advise you to continue improving it while it's in the queue as I think it's very unlikely to be accepted in its current state. The vast majority of the sources are interviews, which can't establish notability, the few independent sources are reviews talk very little about Mats Haugen directly, and there's poor direct sourcing of much of the prose in the article. [[User:CoffeeCrumbs|CoffeeCrumbs]] ([[User talk:CoffeeCrumbs|talk]]) 08:39, 18 March 2026 (UTC)
:Hello, @[[User:Lots3000|Lots3000]]. 
:A Wikipedia article should be a [[WP:Neutral point of view|neutral summary]] of what the [[WP:DUEWEIGHT|majority of people]] who are [[WP:Independent sources|wholly unconnected]] with the subject have independently chosen to publish about the subject in [[WP:Reliable sources|reliable publications]], (see [[WP:Golden rule|Golden rule]]) and not much else. [[WP:No original research|What you know]] (or anybody else knows) about the subject is not relevant except where it can be [[WP:Verifiability|verified]] from a reliable published source. [[User:ColinFine|ColinFine]] ([[User talk:ColinFine|talk]]) 12:20, 18 March 2026 (UTC)