Editing Eurovision Wiki:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk (section)

= March 19 =

== 02:46, 19 March 2026 review of submission by HarshBharti556 ==
{{Lafc|username=HarshBharti556|ts=02:46, 19 March 2026|draft=Draft:Harsh_Bharti_kickboxing}}
Can you help me how I be more professional [[User:HarshBharti556|HarshBharti556]] ([[User talk:HarshBharti556|talk]]) 02:46, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

:For one, you need to disclose your [[WP:COI]] with this article immediately, before doing ''anything'' else. See [[WP:DISCLOSE]] for guidance on how to do this.
:As for the draft itself, for an article about Harsh Bharti to exist, you need to have ''significant'' coverage ''of'' Harsh Barti, in sources that are both ''reliable'' and ''independent''. Just a list of kickboxing results does not demonstrate this is a notable athlete. Every fact about Bharti ought to have a citation to a reliable and independent source of that information. [[User:CoffeeCrumbs|CoffeeCrumbs]] ([[User talk:CoffeeCrumbs|talk]]) 05:03, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

== 05:27, 19 March 2026 review of submission by Anisha at Increff ==
{{Lafc|username=Anisha at Increff|ts=05:27, 19 March 2026|draft=Draft:Increff}}
Why the page was rejected? [[User:Anisha at Increff|Anisha at Increff]] ([[User talk:Anisha at Increff|talk]]) 05:27, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

:What part of the reviewer's feedback do you not understand? It would be a good idea for you to click on all the blue links within that feedback and read what they lead to.
:I am not a reviewer, but having read the draft myself, I cannot see anything in it, summarised from independent third parties writing about the subject, that suggest anything [[WP:NORG|Noteworthy]] about the subject company. Routine business operations like fund raising and executive personnel changes do not contribute to encyclopedic notability, nor do mere descriptions of what the company does.
:Wikipedia has little use for what a company says about ''itself'', only in what other unconnected third-party [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|Reliable sources]] have said about it at some length (rather than just passing mentions or list entries). {The poster formerly known as 87.81.230.195} [[Special:Contributions/&#126;2026-76101-8|&#126;2026-76101-8]] ([[User talk:&#126;2026-76101-8|talk]]) 05:50, 19 March 2026 (UTC)
:{{u|Anisha at Increff}} I suggest that you read [[WP:BOSS]], and show it to your superiors and colleagues; most company representatives fail in their efforts to force the issue of creating an article about their company instead of allowing one to organically develop the usual way, when an independent editor takes note of significant coverage in independent [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] and chooses to write about the topic, summarizing what those sources say.  Company representatives, especially without prior editing experience, have great difficulty doing that, as they myust set aside what they know about their own company and all materials it puts out, as well as all reporting of routine business activities(like commencing operations, raising capital, acquiring competitors). [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 08:18, 19 March 2026 (UTC)
::Hey i am very new to this can you explain in simple [[User:Anisha at Increff|Anisha at Increff]] ([[User talk:Anisha at Increff|talk]]) 10:56, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

== 09:53, 19 March 2026 review of submission by Jakob Øverland ==
{{Lafc|username=Jakob Øverland|ts=09:53, 19 March 2026|draft=Draft:Martin_Villhelm_Kroken_Viksøy}}
Hi, I’m new to Wikipedia and was wondering why my draft was rejected, and what changes are needed to make it suitable for publication.
Thank you for your help. [[User:Jakob Øverland|Jakob Øverland]] ([[User talk:Jakob Øverland|talk]]) 09:53, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

:Hello, @[[User:Jakob Øverland|Jakob Øverland]].
:A Wikipedia article should be a [[WP:Neutral point of view|neutral summary]] of what the [[WP:DUEWEIGHT|majority of people]] who are [[WP:Independent sources|wholly unconnected]] with the subject have independently chosen to publish about the subject in [[WP:Reliable sources|reliable publications]], (see [[WP:Golden rule|Golden rule]]) and not much else. [[WP:No original research|What you know]] (or anybody else knows) about the subject is not relevant except where it can be [[WP:Verifiability|verified]] from a reliable published source.
:Your draft does not resemble that description in any way. 
:My earnest advice to new editors is to not even ''think'' about  trying to create an article until you have spent several weeks - at least - learning about how Wikipedia works by making improvements to existing articles. Once you have understood core policies such as [[WP:verifiability|verifiability]], [[WP:neutral point of view|neutral point of view]], [[WP:42|reliable, independent sources]], and [[WP:notability|notability]], and experienced how we handle disagreements with other editors (the [[WP:BRD|Bold, Revert, Discuss]] cycle), then you might be ready to read [[WP:your first article|your first article]] carefully, and try creating a draft. If you don't follow this advice but try to create an article without this preparation, you are likely to have a frustrating and disappointing experience with Wikipedia. [[User:ColinFine|ColinFine]] ([[User talk:ColinFine|talk]]) 10:04, 19 March 2026 (UTC)