Editing
Eurovision Wiki:Teahouse
(section)
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Struggling to incorporate different perspective == Hi, I was trying to flesh out the article for ''[[The Yellow Scale]]'' with some info from a book by a scholar whose area of expertise is Comparative Literature and German. However, the book treats the picture as if it were a portrait of Charles Baudelaire, rather than what's stated on the article (what seems to be the prevailing view among art historians, which is that it's a self-portrait). It doesn't directly contradict this view because it doesn't even acknowledge it. I found some info on an art history blog saying there's a faction of scholars who believe it to be a portrait of Baudelaire, but no primary evidence of this. What do you do when a single accredited source is on a totally different wavelength from the existing text but doesn't properly engage with it? [[User:Mafarkafut|Kaspar Hauser]] ([[User talk:Mafarkafut|talk]]) 07:19, 16 March 2026 (UTC) :{{U|Mafarkafut}} (Kaspar Hauser), "the book treats the picture as if it were a portrait of Charles Baudelaire" is curiously indirect. Does the book treat the picture as a portrait of Baudelaire? If it does, and if the book gives some reasoning for this interpretation, then I'd mention it (but I'd skip talk of the "faction of scholars"); if the author fails to assert this directly or asserts it but provides no reasoning for it, then I wouldn't mention it. I can't cite any guideline to back me up here, and so may well be contradicted. -- [[User:Hoary|Hoary]] ([[User talk:Hoary|talk]]) 11:39, 16 March 2026 (UTC) :Hi @[[User:Mafarkafut|Mafarkafut]], :You could mention the possibility of ''The Yellow Scale'' being a portrait of Baudelaire within the article and note that it's not the consensus, a method opted for in a number of articles. As an example you could refer to [[Death of Diana, Princess of Wales|this article]], section "Conspiracy Theories", which demonstrates this way of acknowledging perspectives that don't agree with the consensus. For more information you can also refer to WP:UNDUE and WP:FRINGE which provide guidelines to treat this kind of information. :Happy editing! [[User:Paolo Roland Self|Paolo Roland Self]] ([[User talk:Paolo Roland Self|talk]]) 15:07, 16 March 2026 (UTC)
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Eurovision Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Eurovision Wiki:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Navigation menu
Personal tools
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Namespaces
Project page
Discussion
English
Views
Read
Edit source
View history
More
Search
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Page information