Editing Eurovision Wiki:Fringe theories/Noticeboard (section)

== User:Jitterati ==

*{{userlinks|Jitterati}}

Brand new account (at least going by edit dates), and has been on a tear adding stuff related to TCM.  A couple of the edits I checked seem to be LLM-generated, complete with ISBN errors, but I don't know this stuff at all, and most of the sources are in Chinese.  It feels a bit off, and their contribs could use some scrutiny. &ndash;[[User:Deacon Vorbis|Deacon Vorbis]]&nbsp;([[User Talk:Deacon Vorbis|carbon]]&nbsp;&bull;&nbsp;[[Special:Contributions/Deacon Vorbis|videos]]) 00:20, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

:Hello, I am the editor in question. I appreciate the scrutiny and would like to address the concerns raised here.

:The content I added was not generated by a large language model. All text was directly translated and summarized from authoritative, nationally standardized Chinese medical university textbooks (全国高等中医药院校规划教材). These are the official textbooks used across all traditional Chinese medicine universities in China, published by China Press of Traditional Chinese Medicine (中国中医药出版社) and People's Medical Publishing House (人民卫生出版社). The specific books include: Gao Xuemin (高学敏), ed., ''Zhongyao Xue'' [Chinese Materia Medica], 2002 (ISBN 978-7-80156-318-7); Sun Guangren (孙广仁), ed., ''Zhongyi Jichu Lilun'' [Basic Theory of Traditional Chinese Medicine], 2002 (ISBN 978-7-80156-323-1); Deng Zhongjia (邓中甲), ed., ''Fangji Xue'' [Science of Formulas], 2003 (ISBN 978-7-80156-322-4); and others in the same nationally standardized series. These are not obscure sources. They are the standard educational references for TCM in China, comparable to how Harrison's ''Principles of Internal Medicine'' is standard for Western medical education.

:The ISBN errors in my first round of edits were simple transcription mistakes from copying digits off physical books. I identified these errors myself and made a second round of edits to correct all of them, as can be seen in my contribution history. This is a normal part of the editing process.

:The sources are primarily in Chinese because the most authoritative references on traditional Chinese medicine are naturally Chinese-language publications. This is no different from citing French-language sources for topics in French intellectual history or German-language sources for topics in German philosophy.

:I am happy to provide specific page references from these textbooks for any passage that is questioned. I welcome constructive review and collaboration to improve the accuracy of these articles. [[User:Jitterati|Jitterati]] ([[User talk:Jitterati|talk]]) 12:53, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

::Can you please explain why you have been systematically ''removing'' sourced content from articles? [[User:AndyTheGrump|AndyTheGrump]] ([[User talk:AndyTheGrump|talk]]) 13:00, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
::{{pb}} Obvious LLM is obvious...I've had enough. &ndash;[[User:Deacon Vorbis|Deacon Vorbis]]&nbsp;([[User Talk:Deacon Vorbis|carbon]]&nbsp;&bull;&nbsp;[[Special:Contributions/Deacon Vorbis|videos]]) 16:09, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

:I strongly suspect that this editor is using an LLM to generate their content, but even if they're not, by their own admission each one of their submissions has contained serious careless errors. If the content was created with so little care, by man or machine, that's enough reason to revert it. [[User:ApLundell|ApLundell]] ([[User talk:ApLundell|talk]]) 16:45, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
:This is not ANI, take it there. [[User:Slatersteven|Slatersteven]] ([[User talk:Slatersteven|talk]]) 16:47, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
::It's fine here. - [[User:Roxy the dog|'''Walter''' ]]<small>not in the Epstein files</small> [[User talk:Roxy the dog|'''Ego''']]  17:02, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
:Those sources are also unlikely to meet [[WP:MEDRS]]... [[Special:Contributions/&#126;2026-10830-00|&#126;2026-10830-00]] ([[User talk:&#126;2026-10830-00|talk]]) 14:14, 10 March 2026 (UTC)