Editing Eurovision Wiki:Village pump (proposals) (section)

== Innapropriate content involving fictional children ==
I encountered what is very likely an objectionable illustration of what is likely intended to be a creature below age of consent on the encyclopedia. I reverted the edit and don't know what else I should do.

EDIT: Seeing that I have no replies, let me clarify: Furry Child Porn. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Phlogiston Enthusiast|Phlogiston Enthusiast]] ([[User talk:Phlogiston Enthusiast#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Phlogiston Enthusiast|contribs]]) 20:11, 17 March 2026 (UTC)</small>

:Aaaaaand why would we need a new policy with regards to this? It's very easy to argue that posting explicit cub artwork is ''de facto'' [[WP:DE|disruptive]] without needing a specific policy for it. (In fact I'd argue that, given it is illegal in some jurisdictions, there's literally no reason for us to use any sort of cub images.) —[[User:Jéské Couriano|<i style="color: #1E90FF;">Jéské Couriano</i>]] [[User talk:Jéské Couriano|<span style="color: #228B22">v^&lowbar;^v</span>]] <sup><small>[[User:Jéské Couriano/AG|threads]] [[User:Jéské Couriano/Decode|critiques]]</small></sup> 21:19, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
:'''Support removing content''' - [[WP:Censored|Wikipedia is not censored]] and all, but we can't just use it as an excuse to post disgusting content on an encyclopedia, especially when it lacks educational justification.
:Just like what Jeske said, certain countries have made laws that designate such content as illegal and I don't think that we should risk getting banned in these countries just because we want to die on a hill that'll tank our reputation.
:Overall: I think that you are very justified to revert these edits and I'm willing to back you if possible
:[[User:GuesanLoyalist|GuesanLoyalist]] ([[User talk:GuesanLoyalist|talk]]) 03:34, 18 March 2026 (UTC)
::For what it's worth, the content in question was removed and the edits where it was added [[WP:REVDEL|revision-deleted]]. Hence my comment about not needing a new policy above. —[[User:Jéské Couriano|<i style="color: #1E90FF;">Jéské Couriano</i>]] [[User talk:Jéské Couriano|<span style="color: #228B22">v^&lowbar;^v</span>]] <sup><small>[[User:Jéské Couriano/AG|threads]] [[User:Jéské Couriano/Decode|critiques]]</small></sup> 03:48, 18 March 2026 (UTC)
:::So it was indeed removed? Thanks for telling me on that one [[User:GuesanLoyalist|GuesanLoyalist]] ([[User talk:GuesanLoyalist|talk]]) 03:52, 18 March 2026 (UTC)
:::The revisions were undeleted, {{re|Jéské Couriano|p=}}. Relevant discussion is at [[Talk:Yiff#Hidden page revisions]]. [[User:Chess enjoyer|Chess enjoyer]] ([[User talk:Chess enjoyer|talk]]) 03:53, 18 March 2026 (UTC)
:Topicstarter is talking about [[Clop (erotic fan art)]], if anyone is wondering.  Looking at the picture - no, I don't think the character depicted is underage.  [[user:sapphaline|<span class="skin-nightmode-reset-color" style="color:#c20;text-decoration:underline">sapphaline</span>]] ([[user talk:sapphaline|<span class="skin-nightmode-reset-color" style="color:#236;text-decoration:underline">talk</span>]]) 08:14, 18 March 2026 (UTC)
::Though I agree that [[:commons:Commons:Child protection|Commons' policy on CSAM]] doesn't seem to cover [[:en:wikt:cub porn|cub porn]], especially when the character isn't really anthropomorphic.  [[user:sapphaline|<span class="skin-nightmode-reset-color" style="color:#c20;text-decoration:underline">sapphaline</span>]] ([[user talk:sapphaline|<span class="skin-nightmode-reset-color" style="color:#236;text-decoration:underline">talk</span>]]) 08:39, 18 March 2026 (UTC)