Editing Eurovision Wiki:Teahouse (section)

== Victims name ==

: The supreme Court of India specifically told the victims name should not be reported but it's still there  

[[2024 Kolkata rape and murder]]. [[User:Stanjik|Stanjik]] ([[User talk:Stanjik|talk]]) 21:11, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

:The Supreme Court of India has no jurisdiction over Wikipedia. <span class="vcard"><span class="fn">[[User:Pigsonthewing|Andy Mabbett]]</span> (<span class="nickname">Pigsonthewing</span>); [[User talk:Pigsonthewing|Talk to Andy]]; [[Special:Contributions/Pigsonthewing|Andy's edits]]</span> 21:30, 16 March 2026 (UTC)
::But [[Talk:2024 Kolkata rape and murder/Archive 3|this RfC]] does. I've reverted the article back to a clean state. I do not believe a revdel is necessary. [[User:ChildrenWillListen|<span style="color:green">Children</span> <span style="color:purple">Will</span> <span style="color:red">Listen</span>]] ([[User talk:ChildrenWillListen|🐄 talk]], [[Special:Contributions/ChildrenWillListen|🫘 contribs]]) 23:56, 16 March 2026 (UTC)
:::Maybe irrelevant, but I'd personally have voted to keep the name if I was around for that RfC, for the following reasons:<br>
:::1: <s>Trump</s> Today's world leaders should not get the idea that with a single order or court mandate, they can influence the contents of Wikipedia to their whim. If we allow leaders, especially Authoritarians, to influence Wikipedia, you have a very steep slide which has been coated in a thick layer of butter.<br> 
:::2: Adding to this, while India has ruled that the name be excluded, the US has not. Wikipedia, being run by the Wikimedia Foundation (based in America), should have no reason to exclude the name. <span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif; font-size: 16px;">--'''''[[User:DollarStoreBaal44|<span style="color:#023020">DollarStoreBa'al</span>]][[User Talk:DollarStoreBaal44|<sup><span style="color:#000080">Converse</span></sup>]]'''''</span> 19:44, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
::::I totally get where you're coming from. While I voted to exclude in that RFC, I disagreed strongly with the close, specifically the third factor named in that close (I feel the arguments about local cultural norms shouldn't have been taken into consideration in the formation of any consensus). But at the end of the day, that ''was'' the result of the RFC, which is a robust expression of consensus on a particular subject, and I don't see an objective basis for saying that the consensus has changed. I'd bet that the vast majority of editors with experience have been on the wrong ends of many consensuses they strongly feel are wrong. [[User:CoffeeCrumbs|CoffeeCrumbs]] ([[User talk:CoffeeCrumbs|talk]]) 02:31, 18 March 2026 (UTC)