Editing Eurovision Wiki:Teahouse (section)

== Yes, half of the articles are stubs - so what? ==

Yes, half of the articles are stubs - so what?
Recently I tried adding an article - to find out, that its content quality is not yet in line with Wikipedia expectation.
If half of the articles are considered to be Stub - maybe that is good enough for the audience?
Is it possible to add a Draft to the Stub collection?
[[Wikipedia:Stub]].

Anyway, one of the Stub articles is: [[Investor Relations Society]]. 

The rejected draft article is: [[Draft:Global Investor Relations Network]].

I agree, it is stub or incomplete.
Unless you find enough people with motivation to do it better - half of the articles will remain stub, and new content may not find its way into the platform.
Anyway, I asked the Stub if they have volunteers to look into that. [[User:Matjung|Matjung]] ([[User talk:Matjung|talk]]) 18:44, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

:It can take years for a stub to be updated. I created a stub [[perineum sunning]] a few years ago, and only recently fleshed it out into a larger article based on news events that happened after I created the stub.
:An even older stub I made (15 years ago!), [[Sayyid Baraka]], is still a stub in spite of having many different editors make edits to it. It's likely to remain that way unless I or someone revisits it, because it already supplies sufficient information about the subject. ~[[User:Anachronist|Anachronist]] (who / me) <small>([[User talk:Anachronist|talk]])</small> 19:12, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
:Oh, and a stub is fine if it provides adequate sourcing. You basically need two or three sources that meet all the [[WP:Golden Rule]] criteria. ~[[User:Anachronist|Anachronist]] (who / me) <small>([[User talk:Anachronist|talk]])</small> 19:13, 17 March 2026 (UTC)