Editing Talk:Canadian federal election results in Toronto

{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|
{{WikiProject Elections and Referendums}}
{{WikiProject Canada|ppap=yes|on=yes|importance=low|Toronto=yes|Toronto-importance=low}}
}}
{{merged|Canadian federal election results in Suburban Toronto|March 1, 2026}}

== Merge proposal ==

Reliable secondary sources from the last election typically highlight the difference between the "[[Area codes 416, 647, 437, and 942|416]]" and "[[Area codes 905, 289, 365, and 742|905]]" rather than divisions within those areas. [https://thelocal.to/gta-federal-election-results-2025/ The Local][https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/gta-federal-election-storylines-1.7518669 CBC][https://www.thestar.com/politics/federal-elections/how-toronto-voted-in-the-2025-federal-election/article_017fccaa-696d-48e2-b15c-a666af281baa.html Toronto Star]. When splits are brought up within the 905, it is more often between the individual regions (York, Peel, etc.) rather than a combination like with the current articles. [https://nationalpost.com/news/politics/federal_election/federal-election-toronto-gta National Post][https://toronto.citynews.ca/2025/04/28/canada-election-live-results-2025-toronto-gta/ CityNews]. News coverage from previous elections seems to follow a similar pattern [https://globalnews.ca/news/8196230/canada-election-905-voters-influence-analysis/ Global News][https://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/oct/13/canadia-election-immigrants-stephen-harper The Guardian][https://www.bbc.com/news/live/world-us-canada-58627794?src_origin=BBCS_BBC&post=asset%3A2ad87467-0cfa-479f-b475-e09c21a77104#post BBC]

The scope of our articles thus does not match up with the scope primarily used by secondary sources when discussing election results, which makes it more difficult to find secondary sources to write about the area as a whole (something [[WP:LISTN]] considers). Thus, the structure of these articles should change. With the sources primarily dividing between Toronto and its suburbs, I think the best option for the GTA is two pages: One for Toronto and one for the suburbs. ~'''[[User:Username6892|<span style="color:black">UN6892</span>]]''' <sup>[[User talk:Username6892|t]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contribs/Username6892|c]]</sub> 17:07, 22 February 2026 (UTC)

:It might make sense to merge the two Toronto articles together (as the split is somewhat arbitrary), but I'm not as convinced for the 905 region. Should we have an article on how important the 905 is when it comes to Canadian elections? Absolutely. However, the 905 is huge, and each region in the 905 is distinct, and deserves its own article in my opinion. But, the regions as they are currently titled are odd, seemingly arbitrary, and probably need to be re-named with a slight change in focus to reflect the actual subdivisions of the 905 (they were created in 2004, and so their categorization is out of date as the region has a lot more ridings now). Here's what I would recommend:
:*[[Canadian federal election results in Brampton, Mississauga and Oakville]] rename to [[Canadian federal election results in Peel Region]]
:*[[Canadian federal election results in Southern Durham and York]] rename to [[Canadian federal election results in York Region]]
:*[[Canadian federal election results in Hamilton, Burlington and Niagara]] rename to [[Canadian federal election results in Hamilton and Niagara]] (or possibly even split Hamilton and Niagara) 
:And the creation of two new articles:
:*[[Canadian federal election results in Durham Region]] (now has 5 ridings)
:*[[Canadian federal election results in Halton Region]] (now has 5 ridings)
:This more closely resembles the regions we used to categorize [[Results of the 2025 Canadian federal election by riding]].-- [[User:Earl Andrew|Earl Andrew]] - [[User talk:Earl Andrew|talk]] 16:14, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
::<strong>Do we need the riding-by-riding results in these articles?</strong> I know the 905's size may make a large page a bit unwieldy, but I'm not sure the level of detail in the riding-by-riding results would be necessary in those pages when those already exist for the "Results in X election by riding" articles. 
::Regarding the distinction of each place, the reliable sources I've linked (as well as the other sources I have read and seen) seem to group the 905 together much more commonly than split into the various regional municipalities in the area. An additional benefit of this categorization would be the ability to have boundaries that change over time, particularly in areas with a large amount of sprawl (such as Toronto's suburbs). Individual regions occasionally have an impact in individual elections, but it is not common enough to likely be notable across many historical elections. ~'''[[User:Username6892|<span style="color:black">UN6892</span>]]''' <sup>[[User talk:Username6892|t]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contribs/Username6892|c]]</sub> 22:43, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
:::Do we need the riding-by-riding results in these articles? Yes, that's the whole point of these articles, pretty much. Of course, I don't think it would be necessary to list the riding by riding results if we have an article for the whole 905, as long as the articles on the individual regions stay (as I am proposing). I think an article on the 905 might be a good idea to outline its importance in Canadian elections, but not necessary to get into the details of individual ridings. -- [[User:Earl Andrew|Earl Andrew]] - [[User talk:Earl Andrew|talk]] 14:52, 24 February 2026 (UTC)
::::The reason I am skeptical is because I don't really see how each individual riding in each individual election is vital to the region's history (across multiple elections) and the "Results of X election by riding" pages exist to show riding-by-riding results. ~'''[[User:Username6892|<span style="color:black">UN6892</span>]]''' <sup>[[User talk:Username6892|t]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contribs/Username6892|c]]</sub> 01:40, 25 February 2026 (UTC)
:I've completed the Toronto merge since neither of us were opposed to it. ~'''[[User:Username6892|<span style="color:black">UN6892</span>]]''' <sup>[[User talk:Username6892|t]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contribs/Username6892|c]]</sub> 20:18, 1 March 2026 (UTC)