Talk:HR 4729

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on HR 4729. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081025193012/http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/multimedia/images/raw/raw-images-details.cfm?feiImageID=169588 to http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/multimedia/images/raw/raw-images-details.cfm?feiImageID=169588

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:12, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Merge with Acrux

It is rather weird to have this system splitted in two articles, so why don't merge them together and have information centralized in only one article as an advantage? 21 Andromedae (talk) 11:05, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

Yes, I also think both articles should be merged together. But i still doubt both the stars are related to each other Abdullah1099 (talk) 07:19, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Why you doubt both the stars (star systems, i presume) are related to each other? 21 Andromedae (talk) 13:01, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Yeah, It's look like both are part of same system with different names. I think that can be one reason for my doubt. Abdullah1099 (talk) 13:05, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

I think @21.Andromedae, we should take view of @Lithopsian the creator of the page before closing and merging. Abdullah1099 (talk) 12:05, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

I'm happy to follow the consensus. There is certainly an element of confusion with the current situation, but a single larger article needs to be very clear about the nomenclature. I think maybe I've added most of the necessary explanation at Acrux, so might be a fairly easy merge. Note that not all "gravitationally bound" star systems are described in single articles, most notably perhaps Mizar and Alcor (star), plus Mizar and Alcor for good measure. Should I add Sirius B that just got de-merged after being previously merged, and Proxima Centauri? Lithopsian (talk) 14:37, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

I think yeah Mizar and Alcor type works can be done but it will better for HR 4729 to be with Acrux rather than a separate article. For Sirius B it is similar to Mira B and Mira system type article rather than Acrux. Proxima Centauri is good of it's own there is not needed to merge it but yeah, the infobox can be updated to add it based on data. Abdullah1099 (talk) 14:56, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

@21.Andromedae, I think the discussion should be closed as there is a concensus on merger Abdullah1099 (talk) 10:36, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

I'd wait at least a week (that is, until March 20) to close the discussion. 21 Andromedae (talk) 15:02, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

Yeah, No problem it's fine Abdullah1099 (talk) 15:07, 18 March 2026 (UTC)