Talk:Main Street Sports Group
Template:WikiProject banner shell
Feedback from New Page Review process
[edit source]I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Needs an infobox. See Template:Infobox company..
TomCat4680 (talk) 12:03, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
- We shall see. I might have some time this weekend to do just that. - AppleBsTime (talk) 02:20, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
Should the bankruptcy be split into a separate article/is the company notable
[edit source]Five sports franchises have seen effects from the bankruptcy of Diamond Sports. The San Diego Padres, Arizona Diamondbacks, The ACC, the Phoenix Suns and most recently the Arizona Coyotes. The company itself is not particularly notable. In my opinion this article should either be transitioned to focus on the Bankruptcy primarily or be split. A split could also include recent television changes that were moved by this regional sports network "crisis."
Adding some people who might have thoughts. I just want a consensus.
Thanks! Esolo5002 (talk) 04:15, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
- Yes, it seems like there should be an overall regional sports network realignment article that also covers the coinciding AT&T SportsNet closure. It sort of reminds me of pages like 1994–1996 United States broadcast television realignment and 2006 United States broadcast television realignment, but we now have teams changing networks instead of channels changing network affiliations. Zzyzx11 (talk) 04:30, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
Merge proposal
[edit source]Unless Main Street Sports Group does some other notable business activity after FanDuel Sports Network folds later this year, I do not see justifications for keeping separate articles in the long run. All Main Street (formerly Diamond) really did was just be a holding company for the network, and the article currently just seems like a detailed history fork of the network with a bunch of proselines and tables. The fact that it also held minority ownership in the YES Network can still be listed in a single line in a section (as it does now), and does not really need a whole separate article either. Zzyzx11 (talk) 17:39, 13 March 2026 (UTC)