Editing Talk:Ukrainian conscription crisis (section)

== Clarification needed on the use of “human wave” tactics ==

The current version of the article suggests that Russia’s advances are largely due to the use of “human wave” tactics, Specificly inside the "Troop shortage" section. While it’s true that Russian forces have at times employed frontal infantry assaults especially involving Storm-Z and penal units this description risks oversimplifying a much more complex operational reality and may unintentionally mislead readers.
Several reputable sources (including ISW, RUSI, and analysis by Michael Kofman himself) have pointed out that Russia has evolved tactically by:
Using small-unit infiltration tactics supported by drones and precision artillery,
using light assault units mounted on motorbikes ATVs and other light vehicles
and has fixed major issues within their supply chain that where highlighted within the overextention of their forces in Kiev and Kharkiv.

Up until this point all of the recorded "human wave" attacks were just really small probing attacks with 2-4 men supported with drones and artillery. These guys' jobs are to go up to enemy positions and provoke them to see how large or small the response is, almost all large Russian breakthroughs are preceded by these small attacks. The fall of Kalynove both Shcherbaky and Mali Shcherbaky were only possible because of these probing attacks showing gaps within the UAF's defencive line.

Thoughts? [[User:GamerKatze|GamerKatze]] ([[User talk:GamerKatze|talk]]) 16:13, 20 April 2025 (UTC)