If you are unable to complete a move for technical reasons, you can request a technical move below. This is the correct method if you tried to move a page, but you got an error message saying something like "You do not have permission to move this page, for the following reasons:..." or "This page could not be moved, for the following reason:..."
If you are here because you want an admin to approve of your new article or your proposed page move, you are in the wrong place.
Because you are autoconfirmed, you can move most pages yourself. Do not request technical assistance on this page if you can do it yourself.
If you need help determining whether it's okay to move the page to a different title, then please follow the instructions at the top of Wikipedia:Requested moves.
Please make sure you really need technical assistance before making a request here. In particular, if the target page is a redirect back to the source page that has only one revision, you can usually move the page normally.
To list a technical request: edit the Uncontroversial technical requests subsection and insert the following code at the bottom of the list, filling in pages and reason:
{{subst:RMassist|current page title|new title|reason=edit summary for the move}}
This will automatically insert a bullet and include your signature. Please do not edit the article's talk page.
To request a reversion of a recent undiscussed move: Review the guidelines at WP:RMUM of whether a reversion of an undiscussed move qualifies as uncontroversial and if so, edit the Requests to revert undiscussed moves subsection and insert the following code at the bottom of the list, filling in pages and reason:
{{subst:RMassist|current page title|new title|reason=edit summary for the move}}
This will automatically insert a bullet and include your signature. Please do not edit the article's talk page. Note that in some cases, clerks, such as administrators or page movers may determine that your request for a reversion does not pass the criteria and may move the request to the contested section or open a formal requested move discussion for potentially controversial moves on your behalf.
If you object to a proposal listed in the uncontroversial technical requests section, please move the request to the Contested technical requests section, append a note on the request elaborating on why, and sign with ~~~~. Consider pinging the requester to let them know about the objection.
If your technical request is contested, or if a contested request is left untouched without reply, create a requested move on the article talk and remove the request from the section here. The fastest and easiest way is to click the "discuss" button at the request, save the talk page, and remove the entry on this page. A bot will automatically remove contested requests after 72 hours of inactivity.
Most requests should be placed below this heading.
Geoff Epstein (politician) is invalid. Must create Geoff Epstein (politician) before requesting that it be moved to Geoff EpsteinGeoff Epstein.– Geoff Epstein should now be redirected here instead since the name is spelled differently and shorter than the name of Jeffrey Epstein, which it currently redirects to. TarheelBornBred (talk) 3:20, 19 March 2026 (UTC)
@Rejoy2003 Your earlier move of this page was reverted by MN Shenoy, making this a WP:PCM and should go through a WP:RSPM unless they don't have objections to the renaming under this rationale that you provided here. HurricaneZetaC 20:51, 16 March 2026 (UTC)
While the case could be made, the article appears to be predominantly about criticisms of the prison system and conditions, a broader-topic article should have more WP:DUE coverage of other factors. With the current weight it could be Criticism of Prisons in France or similar but I feel that's too lengthy. (and unnecessary - given the topic, most coverage will trend negative anyways) - not contesting this however, I can still see merit in renaming it to make it more concise. ASUKITE 15:15, 18 March 2026 (UTC)
Try submitting the draft again. 1isall (talk | contribs) 19:34, 18 March 2026 (UTC)
Roslund & Hellström is invalid. Must create Roslund & Hellström before requesting that it be moved to Anders Roslund.– Crime writer duo Roslund & Hellström published seven books between 2004 and 2016. Hellström died in 2017. Anders Roslund has since published two books with another writer and seven on his own, with an eigth to be published in June 2026. It seems reasonable the article about these books change title from Roslund & Hellström to Anders Roslund. Lars A (talk) 02:00, 19 March 2026 (UTC)
How is this uncontroversial? Hellstrom's death does not make his notability disappear. I do note however, that Börge Hellström is a standalone article, but Anders Roslund is not. This is all best discussed at Talk:Roslund & Hellström. 162 etc. (talk) 02:22, 19 March 2026 (UTC)
Boda, Bangladesh is invalid. Must create Boda, Bangladesh before requesting that it be moved to Boda.– Moving to primary topic. The disambiguation page has been moved to Boda (disambiguation). Since Boda currently exists as a redirect with history, a technical move is required. Galib Hasan7 (talk) 09:55, 19 March 2026 (UTC)
Primary topic grabs are not uncontroversial. I have reverted your move. Tenshi! (Talk page) 10:02, 19 March 2026 (UTC)
Edit this section only if your request requires an administrator. Usually, do so if the page has been fully protected or move protected (see this guide to which moves need administrators). Place your request in another section if it only requires a page mover.
Courtesy link: Talk:Vladimir Ivashko § Post-RM comment Whyiseverythingalreadyused (t · c · he/him) 12:42, 18 March 2026 (UTC)
