Talk:Kunal Kamra
Template:Talk header Template:WikiProject banner shell
Note
[edit source]See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kunal Kamra. Robert McClenon (talk) 07:26, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
Incident on Indigo flight
[edit source]This source uses "allegedly heckling" (so if we want to quote the source accurately we should include "allegedly"). This source says he "unleashed a barrage of questions on him" and uses the word "diatribe".This source uses the word "incident".
I think the original wording "confronted" is a good summary of all the sources. Lard Almighty (talk) 13:49, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
- Who are "we"? Wikipedia account must be used by an individual not an organization. Can you clarify your edit summary? Use what most RS are using or I will file a dispute resolution. I assume you're are watching this page. // Signature 16:39, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
- "We" are Wikipedians. We follow Wikipedia policies. In this case there is not one word that the majority of sources use. There is a variety of words used by the sources as noted above. Confronted is a good WP:NPOV summary of what the various sources say. Lard Almighty (talk) 16:46, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
- Disagreed, most sources use heckled. // Signature 16:48, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
- Can you post all the links from different sources that use heckled please? I have listed the sources that I can find above, including one that uses "allegedly heckled" and three others that use different words. Where are the other sources that use heckled? Thank you. Lard Almighty (talk) 16:51, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
- @@Lard Almighty: is it enough? // Signature 17:09, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
- I still think that "heckling" is not WP:NPOV and this is a WP:BLP so we have to be careful. I would be OK with "allegedly heckling", in quotes to show that we are directly quoting some of the sources. Lard Almighty (talk) 17:11, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks. // Signature 17:26, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
- I don't see how saying he heckled is an NPOV issue when those sources clearly categorically state that he did. If anything, the quotations unduly cast doubt on what the reliable sources say is true, so in a way not only act as MOS:WEASEL, but generally cast factually incorrect doubt on the incident. LΞVIXIUS💬 18:11, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
- Some sources use the word, others don't. The definition of heckle (according to Mirriam Webster is "to harass and try to disconcert with questions, challenges, or gibes.". That definitely has negative connotations that a word like "confront" (to face especially in challenge) does not, while still describing what Kamra did. I would be happy to drop the quotes and say allegedly heckled or simply confronted, but that would require further consensus. I would not be happy with use heckled without the word allegedly because of the word's negative connotations. Lard Almighty (talk) 06:46, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
The omission of the word from some sources isn't the source of the word, the usage of the word is. The negative connotation of the word does not have any bearing on its usage in Wikipedia and the pursuance of WP:NPOV, the only thing that matters is that we have over dozens of Reliable News sources categorically stating that he heckled. LΞVIXIUS💬 00:09, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
- There is a difference between quoting a source and saying something in Wikivoice. Especially when dealing with a controversial WP:BLP, and especially where sources differ about an allegation, we have to be careful about doing the latter. Summarising what the range of sources say (e.g. by using a word like confronted) is probably the best course of action, but if we are going to use a word that has negative connotations to describe the event we should put the words in quotes to indicate that we are quoting directly from the sources and that Wikipedia itself is not making the allegation. Lard Almighty (talk) 06:01, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
- Multiple Reliable sources categorically say he heckled, there exists no question on whether he heckled or not. Use what the Reliable Sources say, even if it paints your client in a negative manner, that's what they say. Some sources saying he allegedly heckled and others categorically stating he heckled is not a disagreement in sources. Like the other user said, this will go into dispute resolution if you don't relent. Also there's no consensus, so please stop edit warring until you manage to get one. Also lets not forget that your usage of quotations reek of Irony punctuations which is again a MOS:Weasel violation. LΞVIXIUS💬 05:44, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
- An multiple reliable sources don't use heckled, or use other words as well. It is a controversial word, and so we need to be careful. It is also an allegation. He has neither been charged nor convicted of any offence. So we need to be very careful about stating he heckled in Wikivoice. I quoted the policy that supports the use of quotations. This is a highly controversial BLP, with editors on both sides trying to introduce their POV. Kamra is not "my client". In fact I had never heard of him until this article triggered my vandalism filter. Please do not cast aspersions, as it weakens your case. Lard Almighty (talk) 05:59, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
- I've said it before, the omission of facts is not a fact to be inferred. His having heckled is not of controversy, if it is, please provide reliable sources that explicitly state that he didn't heckle, or that his having heckled is a question at all. His having not being charged or convicted of any offence related to this is also not related. (He has been suspended by multiple airlines for his actions, but even that is not relevant) It's not Wikipedia that is alleging something when it has been clearly stated in RS. LΞVIXIUS💬 06:08, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
- An multiple reliable sources don't use heckled, or use other words as well. It is a controversial word, and so we need to be careful. It is also an allegation. He has neither been charged nor convicted of any offence. So we need to be very careful about stating he heckled in Wikivoice. I quoted the policy that supports the use of quotations. This is a highly controversial BLP, with editors on both sides trying to introduce their POV. Kamra is not "my client". In fact I had never heard of him until this article triggered my vandalism filter. Please do not cast aspersions, as it weakens your case. Lard Almighty (talk) 05:59, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
- Multiple Reliable sources categorically say he heckled, there exists no question on whether he heckled or not. Use what the Reliable Sources say, even if it paints your client in a negative manner, that's what they say. Some sources saying he allegedly heckled and others categorically stating he heckled is not a disagreement in sources. Like the other user said, this will go into dispute resolution if you don't relent. Also there's no consensus, so please stop edit warring until you manage to get one. Also lets not forget that your usage of quotations reek of Irony punctuations which is again a MOS:Weasel violation. LΞVIXIUS💬 05:44, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
- There is a difference between quoting a source and saying something in Wikivoice. Especially when dealing with a controversial WP:BLP, and especially where sources differ about an allegation, we have to be careful about doing the latter. Summarising what the range of sources say (e.g. by using a word like confronted) is probably the best course of action, but if we are going to use a word that has negative connotations to describe the event we should put the words in quotes to indicate that we are quoting directly from the sources and that Wikipedia itself is not making the allegation. Lard Almighty (talk) 06:01, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
- I don't see how saying he heckled is an NPOV issue when those sources clearly categorically state that he did. If anything, the quotations unduly cast doubt on what the reliable sources say is true, so in a way not only act as MOS:WEASEL, but generally cast factually incorrect doubt on the incident. LΞVIXIUS💬 18:11, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks. // Signature 17:26, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
- I still think that "heckling" is not WP:NPOV and this is a WP:BLP so we have to be careful. I would be OK with "allegedly heckling", in quotes to show that we are directly quoting some of the sources. Lard Almighty (talk) 17:11, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 31 May 2020
[edit source]Template:Edit semi-protected Please remove the first full stop of this article just after the word observational comedy, because it is grammatically incorrect. 2402:8100:3A0B:71B1:E9B5:D179:9C3:B8FD (talk) 05:17, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Achievements
[edit source]Anti everything besides congress — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2409:4042:2805:D2AF:AE96:9F61:F4CA:2ECA (talk) 19:30, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
2409:4042:2805:D2AF:AE96:9F61:F4CA:2ECA (talk) 19:33, 31 May 2020 (UTC) :Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate.
{{replyto|Can I Log In}}'s talk page! 20:25, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 9 June 2020
[edit source]Template:Edit semi-protected Please change "In 2020, after an incident on IndiGo airlines where he allegedly "heckled" the Indian news anchor Arnab Goswami, he was banned by five Indian Airlines " to Kunal kamra has featured in most dislike videos of Youtube list (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_most-disliked_YouTube_videos) Kamrakabaap (talk) 00:44, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
Kamrakabaap (talk) 00:57, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
Not done: Wikipedia is not a reliable source, and in any case I fail to see how this would improve the article... RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 00:59, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
Dates of Controversies
[edit source]Hi all. I wanted to know the date of Kunal's latest controversy, where an influential potential was involved as a subject of his comedy. I found a total of three controversies listed in the main article, two of which are already dated - 28 January 2020 and 11 November 2020. Incidentally the only controversy that is undated is the one I wanted to know about. I then did some random search and realized that it occurred somewhere around 24 March 2025. I feel after a good confirmation, we should add the date also. This might not appear important now, but let us say somebody wants to find it out, say 2 years later, it would be a problem. Thanks. Neotaruntius (talk) 05:41, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
See also
[edit source]Can we add See also section with relevant articles? DataCrusade1999 (talk) 15:01, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
Proposed merge of Kunal Kamra v. Union of India into Kunal Kamra
[edit source]Primary page has enough to cover the incident. I see no need of separate page. SatnaamIN (talk) 00:36, 7 February 2026 (UTC)
Support – The case can be adequately covered in the main Kunal Kamra article per WP:SUMMARYSTYLE. A separate page appears unnecessary and duplicates content. 赛义菲 (talk) 22:03, 19 February 2026 (UTC)Template:Sock vote Thebiguglyalien (talk) 00:36, 17 March 2026 (UTC)- SaTnamZIN, this has gone unopposed for over a month, you should be good to carry out a merge if this is something you're still interested in. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 00:36, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose The case page is focused more on the legal principles, judgement, and relevance of the case to the legal jurisprudence of India – quite independent of the notability of the defendent in the case. I'd suggest including a brief snippet in the page of Kunal Kamra and then linking to the case page instead of merging. WeWake (talk) 22:42, 18 March 2026 (UTC)